0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
All, I have been doing some research online and in the forum archives and want to address some questions I have in one topic that hopefully others can use a handy reference in the future. The goal for me is to model a Phase III GP9 using the LifeLike GP18 shell with the GMM detail etch and get DCC/Sound fairly easily. From Spookshow's reference Walthers came out with a newly tooled chassis in 2004. My first questions are: is the tooling in terms of detail that much improved versus the previous versions? I understand the cab and short hood? became a single piece and that the pilot was closed, but how about the molding for the detail on the shell, any significant improvement? From what I have been able to gather, there has been a 2004, 2007, 2009, and 2011 release of the GP18 with the newly tooled shell, with the 2007+ being DCC ready. For my next question, these releases all have the same shell that are swapable between releases? A 2004 shell is no different from a 2009 shell? Spookshow notes that the 2007 release with a DCC ready chassis for the first time has some noise in the chassis, with the subsquent releases this has been addressed. I have also read the late release GP18 is one of the best 4 axle locomotives ever to be produced. Is there a fix for the 2007 chassis noise? Is the later release DCC ready GP18 chassis that good when compared to a "modern" mechanism? My next set of questions involve shell swapping the GP18 shell onto other Geep chassises. For shell swaps I have read that a swap with a Atlas GP7/9 mechanism is fairly straight forward, with some material needed to be removed from either the Atlas chassis or GP18 shell. Is this accurate? Would you swap the frame as well or just the GP18 cab and hoods onto a Atlas GP7/9 chassis and frame? LifeLike also made a GP20, which apprarently shared the mechanism with the later GP18s. Atlas has rereleased the LifeLike GP20, would a GP18 shell fit onto the Atlas GP20 chassis, along with if the frame is from the GP18 or the 20? Given the statement on how well the late GP18 chassis ran, is there a point of swapping the GP18 shell onto another chassis? I would imagine the immediate benefit of the Atlas GP20 swap, if feasible, would to get a chassis that is DCC ready or equipped with sound. If you have made it to this point, thank you for the help. The GP18 is starting to get somewhat harder to find in later version, so I would like to see if being particular about a certain release is necessary or not.