Author Topic: playing around with longer exposure times  (Read 372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Iain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4674
  • Gender: Female
  • Na sgrìobhaidh a Iain
  • Respect: +400
    • The Best Puppers
playing around with longer exposure times
« on: January 10, 2025, 11:19:39 PM »
+4
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Decided to have a go at longer exposure time.  f16, 30 second exposure in a dark room.
I like ducks

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3618
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1207
Re: playing around with longer exposure times
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2025, 12:55:31 AM »
0
It looks like there might be a bit of camera shake in your photo.

Are you using a cable release or remote? Also a high quality tripod is essential when taking long exposures.

3 legged thing makes my favorite although there are other brands.
https://www.3leggedthing.com/

Also try playing with your aperture, a smaller aperture would give you more depth of field (not too important here) where a larger one might give nicer bokeh, (possibly not ideal for documentation or roster shots of equipment)

Nice shot tho and nice to see some traditional photography!
The Railwire is not your personal army.  :trollface:

Iain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4674
  • Gender: Female
  • Na sgrìobhaidh a Iain
  • Respect: +400
    • The Best Puppers
Re: playing around with longer exposure times
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2025, 05:28:30 AM »
+1
yeah, i'm not surprised there's some shake going on; this was entirely a 'what will happen if i do this' type thing and i just perched the camera on top of its own lens to get the height correct
I like ducks

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16217
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6622
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: playing around with longer exposure times
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2025, 01:01:07 PM »
+2
That's how I did most of the photography of my old layout.  I had a Canon 5 mp point and shoot, but it offered enough manual settings that I could monkey with the aperture and the exposure time.

Being merely an amateur photographer, I had all kinds of work arounds, especially for "night" shots.  I'd set the camera up, either sitting it right on the layout or on a mini tripod, or sometimes on a proper tripod if the angle required it.

I would flip the room lights off, click the shutter, then while it was open, I would switch the structure lights on and off, then the headlight (using DCC) on and off to prevent those lights from over exposing.  The low ambient light helped mask any depth of field issues, and the long exposure time pulled in a lot of things that otherwise would have been lost in the background.




For daylight shots, the long exposure did a good job of smoothing out the depth of field.  This one could have benefitted from dimming the room lights a bit more.


And tight focus on close ups became one of my favorites. 


Certainly none of the above will be mistaken for the work of Paul Dolkos or Lou Sassi, but I was satisfied with the results, and still enjoy thumbing through all the images I shot with relative ease.

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net