Author Topic: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?  (Read 3397 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2023, 07:17:54 PM »
0
I've built several #10 turnouts with Fast Tracks jigs and they don't allow wheel drop with FVM narrow tread wheels.  It's totally possible.   Striking the balance on the flangeways is not the most straightforward thing, to be sure.  With the Fast Tracks method, you solder the two inner rails on the trailing frog side together first at the angle, then put them in the jig and solder to the ties.  If you push them too far into the frog, your flangeways are narrow.  If you pull them outward, they are too wide for narrow FVM and BLMA wheels (though fine for just about anything else.   The tolerances on the jig do allow for about that much slop, and the differencethe jig allows gets worse the bigger the turnout number . If you want to use narrow tread wheels you want to strike a balance kinda right in the middle.   That is, unless you want to be checking your loco wheels' guage with callipers every time you maintenance them.   In my experience If you really build turnouts tightly to NMRA most loco wheels from the factory will have issues, as well as many older non-MT wheelsets.  Correcting guage on loco wheels is doable, but needs to be more precise the finer you want to make your flangeways.
 
Now, a curved turnout is going to be trickier, as well.

Ah this is good to know and very promising! I should also mention I’ve added a bit of additional complication as I’ve super elevated the curve as well, so perhaps where the wheels may have passed just fine before, now I’m putting additional weight on the inside of the curve and therefor the frog.

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #31 on: December 28, 2023, 07:38:14 PM »
0
Before I get deep into this, the problem you're having with your one curved turnout isn't due to any of your wheelsets' tire width, flange depth, or flange width.  The problem is with your turnout, and it has to do with the turnout's "Track Check Gauge."

A photo of the offending turnout taken from directly downward with the frog centered would be a great help.  Since I don't have that, I'll tell you how to minimize the problem.

I hand-build all of my N-scale turnouts (not using any Fast Tracks jigs, fixtures or tools) and I've been doing this from the late 1970's using Gordy Odegard's article in the February 1976 issue of Model Railroader as a starting point.

Since those early days, I've experimented with and explored various methods to aid me in getting turnouts that look good, work as flawlessly as possible, are robust and don't take me too long to build.

I've learned that there are a few places on N-scale turnouts that need special attention to work reliably.  One of those places is at the frog where you are having problems with your narrow-tired FVM lo-pro wheelsets falling into the frog of one of your Fast Tracks-style hand-made turnouts.

There could be several things contributing to this problem, so let's go through what to check on your turnout.

First, you'll need your NMRA N Standards Gage.

Look at your curved turnout and see if the point of the frog is long and sharp.  It needs to be as long and sharp as possible for functioning the best, and to minimize wheel drop.

Look at the frog wing rails and see if they're parallel to the frog's point rails.

Using the NMRA "Gage"...which I will now call a "Gauge"(capitalized)...carefully check the gauge of all of your trackage in the frog area...and note if there is a spot or two where the gauge is wider than it should be. Make sure to check the gauge between the closure rails and their respective stock rails.  The track gauge between the frog rails and the respective stock rails should be exact...the rails forming an "interference fit" so that the NMRA Gauge track gauge prongs are touching both railheads where you're checking the track gauge, but will still slide through. 

The frog area should be put together so that the track gauge between the frog rails and the adjacent stock rails is an interference fit (both rails touching the "TRACK" gauge prongs on the bottom of the NMRA Gauge, but the Gauge being able to slide down the track.)

The frog's wing rails should be an interference fit between the wing rails and the frog rails on both sides of the frog...once again the FLANGEWAYS prongs sliding through the gap, but touching both rails.

Sliding the NMRA Gauge towards the throwbar, the gap at the sharp bend where the frog's wing rails turn into the closure rails, should be wide enough to let the NMRA Gauge pass through, but tight enough to NOT ALLOW the FMAX prong to pass through. "FMAX" means "Flangeway Maximum" but, it should not pass through any of the flangeways at the frog nor between the stock rails and guardrails (check rails).

Using the NMRA Gauge's FLANGEWAYS prongs, confirm that the track check gauge between the flange side of the guardrails (check rails) and the frog rails is an interference fit.  This is probably the most important part of your turnout to get the spec's correct...so take time to confirm that this measurement allows your NMRA Gauge's FLANGEWAYS prongs to slide through, but still touch both the frog rails and the flange side of the guardrails simultaneously.  If your NMRA Gauge is a little tight here, that's okay (just a LITTLE tight), but if it's too wide, that's bad.

Since your turnout is soldered to PCB ties, you should be able to move your rails from side to side to get your gauge and clearances correct by heating up your rails and sliding the rails with tweezers, then holding in place after you remove your iron until the solder freezes.  I doubt any additional solder will be necessary, but a little flux would ensure a good solder joint.   

To minimize wheel drop, the flangeways between the frog wing rails and the frog rails should be a tight, interference fit.  If the point of your frog isn't as long and sharp as it could be, that will contribute to wheel drop.

You'll note that I said "To minimize wheel drop..." because you're not going to eliminate it, nor do you need to totally eliminate it.

Because N-scale flanges vary quite a bit in their height measurements, it's not really practical to fill the frog with solder or brass strips for the flanges to ride on when the wheel's tire passes over the point of the frog, and a tiny bit of "drop" is fine, and won't affect performance or appearance at all.

I build my turnouts to these "tight" specifications, and I run quite a few sets of FVM Narrow Tread Lo-Pro wheelsets without any problems whatsoever on any of the hand-built turnouts on my layout.

I haven't noticed any "wheel drop" on my turnouts on my layout, nor on my test module, which has Micro Engineering #6's, so I decided to take a very close look at cars with different wheel widths rolling over my "tight" turnouts.

I was surprised by what I found.  Every car that I run on my layout has lo-pro wheelsets...some of them have the original MTL Lo-Pro plastic wheelsets, some have the later version, some have NWSL Lo-Pro metal wheelsets, some have FVM Lo-Pro metal wheelsets, some have FVM Narrow Tread  Lo-Pro metal wheelsets...and every car that I have drops their wheels into my frogs. 

They also drop into Atlas55 turnout frogs, Peco55 turnout frogs and Micro Engineering Code55 #6 turnout frogs.  Every one of them "bumps" a little when they go over these frogs...especially when I am pressing down on the car with my finger. 

They "bump" much less on my "tight" turnouts, but...they still bump.

I have one old test car that has pizza cutters and extra-wide metal wheels on brass axles that I thought I'd try....and it "drops" too!...even with extra wide wheels.

"What's going on here??" I thinks to myself.  Okay...what's going on is that the wheels' tires are tapered, being a larger diameter at where the flange starts and a smaller diameter at the outer edge of the wheel. When passing over the point of the frog, even if the tire is wider than the space where the frog point ends and the closure rail begins, the smaller diameter on the outside of the wheel drops down onto the wing rail (right before the sharp bend in the rail) and climbs back up onto the closure rail as the wing rail gets closer to the bend where it turns into a closure rail.

The distance that all of this happens in is very small, but larger as the size of the turnout increases...but still really small.

There's not much that can be done about this in N-scale due to various flange heights and the wide flange width, with dictates the width of flangeways and also the "check gauge" on each wheelset from the inside of the left flange to the outside of the right flange.  This distance is what dictates the "track check gauge" measurement standard for NMRA compliant N-scale turnouts.

If you were having this problem on a RTR turnout I'd say to use shims to fix it, BUT, since it's on a hand-laid turnout, you should be able to fix the problem using your iron, a tweezer, your NMRA N Standards Gage and maybe a little flux...and moving your rails at the frog so that the clearances become "interference" clearances...which won't completely eliminate wheel droppage for FVM Narrow Tread wheelsets, but will minimize any problems.

For me, since I didn't notice "the problem" before today, I'm not going to worry about...but just continue to build my turnouts to "tight" NMRA Standards as I have been for the past couple of decades, 'cause it works for me.

Photo (1) - FVM Narrow Lo-Pro Wheelset sitting on the frog point on one of my "tight" NMRA Standard #11 turnouts:


Photo (2) - FVM Narrow Lo-Pro Wheelset Dropping Into My #11 Frog:


Photo (3) - FVM Narrow Lo-Pro Wheelset Having Climbed Out of My #11 Frog:


Photo (4) - FVM Narrow Lo-Pro Wheelset Completely On Top of Railhead On Closure Rail On My #11 Turnout:


Hope this helps.

Yes...my photos are vertical...I'll fix 'em after dinner tonight.

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore

Bob,

Thank you so much for taking the time to typing out that amazing response. I have learned so much from that. I’ll do everything you mentioned with my Gauge so that I can see what I’m starting with.

Craig

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #32 on: December 29, 2023, 01:06:35 PM »
+1
Well I did a quick check with my NMRA gauge and I’ve learned that who ever built the turnout did it on the generous side of things. Flange ways are close but you can move the gauge a touch. Definitely not a right fit like Bob talks about.

But that’s progress!  I have a place to start.

Craig

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9896
  • Respect: +1446
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2023, 02:05:28 AM »
+2
Bob:  Tapered treads are why one can also hear a "clunk" when the prototype goes over a frog!
N Kalanaga
Be well

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3254
  • Respect: +500
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #34 on: December 30, 2023, 02:10:34 AM »
0
Bob:  Tapered treads are why one can also hear a "clunk" when the prototype goes over a frog!

Are N scale treads tapered though?  Some are, some aren't?

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3125
  • Respect: +1503
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #35 on: December 30, 2023, 06:04:11 AM »
0
Bob:  Tapered treads are why one can also hear a "clunk" when the prototype goes over a frog!

That's interesting!

Another fact I never knew..  :D

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore


robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3125
  • Respect: +1503
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #36 on: December 30, 2023, 06:08:26 AM »
+1
Are N scale treads tapered though?  Some are, some aren't?

If it's an NMRA RP-25 wheel contour then it has a 3 degree slope from the base of the flange to the outside face of the wheel.

I'm not gonna measure my wheels at this early morning hour, but...when I was investigating the OP's problem, all of the wheelsets I am using are tapered.

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32948
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5338
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #37 on: December 30, 2023, 11:16:22 AM »
0
Are N scale treads tapered though?  Some are, some aren't?

Exactly. Some are not tapered, and even the taper angles (and entire wheel profile imagery) varies between manufacturers (and can be different in different models from the same manufacturer). The fillet between the tread and flange also varies quite dramatically. Nobody seems to come close to the NMRA standards.

Unless someone retrofits the same brand wheels in all their rolling stock, there will be variations. Then there are the locomotives (steam and  diesel). Same problem, and retrofitting wheels is often not an option.
. . . 42 . . .

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #38 on: December 31, 2023, 01:13:18 AM »
+3
Richard Feynmann explaining tapered wheels:


craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #39 on: January 01, 2024, 05:19:25 PM »
+1
Richard Feynmann explaining tapered wheels:


That’s a great video. He looks so excited about it. But then he should be… the concept is so elegantly simple.

prr7161

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 284
  • Respect: +113
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #40 on: January 04, 2024, 01:21:59 PM »
+1
Don't forget the role of the guardrails opposite the frog as well.  The one time I had trouble with FVM wheel operation through a FastTracks turnout was when I had overwidened the guardrail flangeway in an attempt to adjust something else.  It allowed too much pivot slop and created a derailment risk for the FVM wheelsets.
Angela Sutton



The Mon Valley in N Scale

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #41 on: January 09, 2024, 11:47:32 PM »
0
Don't forget the role of the guardrails opposite the frog as well.  The one time I had trouble with FVM wheel operation through a FastTracks turnout was when I had overwidened the guardrail flangeway in an attempt to adjust something else.  It allowed too much pivot slop and created a derailment risk for the FVM wheelsets.

Good to know. Thank you.

Craig

Bill H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 738
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +161
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #42 on: February 01, 2024, 03:54:16 PM »
0
Craig:
I just caught up on this thread. The problem is the turnout guard rails are in the wrong place. I do not believe these were built correctly and I use fine scale FV wheels without any issues on #10 turnouts. I just checked my FT#10 turnouts, and the middle of the guard rails lines up almost exactly with the point of the frog. Your guard rails are not into play when the wheel is almost at the frog. Try moving the guard rails so that they are actually in play when the wheels get close to the frog, that should cure the problem.

Take a look at any FT turnout diagram, you will see the guard rail middle lines up with the frog point. I have attached a FT curved turnout template, look at how the very point of the frog lines up with the middle of the guard rails, which yours do not - so the guard rails are not doing their work when the wheel hits the frog.

Hope this helps.

Kind regards,
Bill

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #43 on: February 02, 2024, 08:53:16 PM »
0
Craig:
I just caught up on this thread. The problem is the turnout guard rails are in the wrong place. I do not believe these were built correctly and I use fine scale FV wheels without any issues on #10 turnouts. I just checked my FT#10 turnouts, and the middle of the guard rails lines up almost exactly with the point of the frog. Your guard rails are not into play when the wheel is almost at the frog. Try moving the guard rails so that they are actually in play when the wheels get close to the frog, that should cure the problem.

Take a look at any FT turnout diagram, you will see the guard rail middle lines up with the frog point. I have attached a FT curved turnout template, look at how the very point of the frog lines up with the middle of the guard rails, which yours do not - so the guard rails are not doing their work when the wheel hits the frog.

Hope this helps.

Kind regards,
Bill

I just had a good look at it and you are correct. That’s something on the list to fix then when I’m back modelling in a couple of months.

Thanks.

Craig

craigolio1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2453
  • Respect: +1771
Re: Hand laid Fine N scale turn out standards / tools / solutions?
« Reply #44 on: April 11, 2024, 10:53:20 PM »
+7
I finally had the time and courage to get into this turnout.

I removed the guard rails and the two frog rails. Initially I moved the frog rails forward toward the frog point and this did wonders. Smooth operation with no drop.



Then I added some new longer guard rails on the sides and extended the guard rails at the end of the frog.



Finally I filled in the new gaps at the bottom end of the frog with styrene. The gaps were more than 1/8”.

The result? It worked great…. But looked like a$$. I was trying to avoid making new frog rails because it scared me.

I was not happy though so I redid those rails and now it works great and looks much better. It took me two tries with each frog tail to get it right.



Now the NMRA just squeezes through all aspects and freight and passenger car wheels don’t drop in. I tried it with a Micro-Trains car, a Rapido passenger car (which is a touch narrow in gauge - the reason I test with it) and an Atlas loco truck. They all glide through. I still have to try a truck with FVM narrow treads but this is as god as it will get I think. The what is, is what will be.

Edit:  At a very slow roll FVM narrow treads traverse the frog with just a bit of movement and a click. At speed you don’t even see it. Good enough for me.
Thanks for everyone’s help!!

Craig




« Last Edit: April 12, 2024, 08:56:28 AM by craigolio1 »