0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That particular model doesn't generally seem to have loose TT problem. I wonder if the traction tire is either the wrong size, or simply stretched out? Maybe replace it with a fresh TT designed for that loco? Or get one of the generic TTs that are available online? I don't recall the specific details about that vendor, but @mmagliaro would likely have that info. I should really record that info somewhere next time Max mentions it.I tightly fitting TT would IMO be the best solution (instead of mickey-mousing things with glue or paint). Call me fastidious . . .
Isn't this very application why they made BullFrog Snot ?? I've been out so long I don't know if it's the right thing to use anymore so take my suggestion with a grain of salt.
https://lovetrainhobbies.com/
Well, if the performance is acceptable without the TT, then by all means run it that way. The only thing is that the traction-tire-less driver's tread is likely not even touching the railhead (since it has a groove in it for the TT). Still, if it works, it's all good.
I know that's the risk, although since my layout is more curve than tangent, there's likely some part of the tread in contact with the rail most of the time... But 5 cars and a caboose didn't phase 27 at all.
I went ahead and replaced the traction tire anyway and secured it with a thin bead of canopy glue all around. I was able to recover a spare from the junker 4-6-0 without stretching it. Although the engine was running just fine without it, replacing it seemed like the a$$hat thing to do. Hopefully I can still keep my plaid membership level!