0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
For that matter, and excuse my ignorance, where did MTH's HO stuff fit in the marketplace, be it quality, scale fidelity, variety, price or market presence?
Lordy... who said "N scale is dead" for ST? Not I. Short version: I said taking on an S product line was likely to be a distraction, and would compete for resources, to N's detriment. It's a small, mostly HO-centric company, and they are spread thin as it is; it's my assessment that the development and support "pie" for secondary lines is finite.I hope to be proven wrong on this and ST will march on unabated in their support of N. I have money on the table in the two Turbines I have committed to, and am hoping beyond hope that the "standard" Turbine project is a foundation to be extended to include U50s. Taking it one step further, if we want to talk about one-railroad orphans, maybe C855s, too? In my lifetime?
I dont think its dead, but it is of note that their HO releases, prior to the acquisition, are along the lines of 4+ to 1 against N scale.
I heard the model railroad manufacturers got together in a secret meeting in Davos Switzerland and decided to kill off N scale. The Model Police will come to your house in the middle of the night and arrest those unlawfully holding on to N scale. Sheesh.
They must be doing something right to have the capitol to purchase the HO and S lines from MTH..Or they just cashed in thier Gamestop Holdings
MTH's line is a mix. Some of their stuff, like Pennsy H9½s (a steam loco that was part H9s and part H10s) was just god awful, with no real prototype, a remote controlled coupler that couldn't easily be replaced with a Kadee, and a drawbar that was so difficult to couple the authorized repair store I took it to broke the engine more just trying to connect the tender.