Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 64991 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #375 on: November 17, 2022, 09:44:29 PM »
0


I have a file for the bridge that goes in that horseshoe curve you were talking about  :D

You mean this one ?

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7730647,-77.4098335,3a,35.3y,246.72h,91.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sKFYqP0e87fnCoG8Zk-IctQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

That's a ways off in the build, but might be the first thing to print  :D

PiperguyUMD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 749
  • Respect: +1820
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #376 on: November 18, 2022, 10:49:29 AM »
+1
That would be a fun one to build. One Christmas when we were visiting my wife's family in PA, I drove down and took all kinds of measurements of the bridge in Sabillasville. I'm sure Lee will point out that I omitted the cast in "WESTERN MARYLAND" but other than that, this one is spot on.



Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24733
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9248
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #377 on: November 18, 2022, 12:54:36 PM »
0
Sploosh

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1477
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +562
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #378 on: November 18, 2022, 03:53:56 PM »
0
Yeah, got to give it the sploosh
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

PiperguyUMD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 749
  • Respect: +1820
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #379 on: November 18, 2022, 08:25:39 PM »
0

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #380 on: November 18, 2022, 08:27:14 PM »
+1
Kind of, I think 🤔

Google it and determine yourself 🤣

PiperguyUMD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 749
  • Respect: +1820
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #381 on: November 18, 2022, 09:05:40 PM »
0
 :facepalm:

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #382 on: November 19, 2022, 08:43:37 AM »
0
Guess you could say you showed off some modeling porn and they got excited  :o

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1477
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +562
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #383 on: November 19, 2022, 11:23:30 AM »
+2
Guess you could say you showed off some modeling porn and they got excited  :o

I guess you could say he was entering a zone…of danger! Lana…Lana…LAna…LANA!!!

Danger Zone
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13386
  • Respect: +3245
Re: Digitrax SMBK Dress Up Kit
« Reply #384 on: December 21, 2022, 04:55:59 PM »
0
Signalling is so far down the line of things to do  :D

I need the signal bridge at Hagerstown and that's about it

This one?


« Last Edit: December 21, 2022, 05:01:17 PM by John »

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: Re: Digitrax SMBK Dress Up Kit
« Reply #385 on: December 21, 2022, 09:26:30 PM »
0
That would be the one.

Edit:  Actually I might need 1 signal from OP.  Looks like their might be a signal protecting CP town on the north side that a westbound would encounter coming into Hagerstown after crossing Pennsylvania Ave

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #386 on: January 16, 2023, 01:14:59 PM »
+4
I posted the raw 3D print photos in the weekend update.  Figured I'd post the cleaned up, painted versions on the layout thread.  3 Walinga style bulk feed trailers for AgCom and 2 bulk conveyor/unloaders for YorkRail Logistics.  Models by Baldylox Designs.  Now need to find some International Prostar and Mack Vision daycabs for AgCom fleet.





mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #387 on: February 03, 2023, 01:16:32 AM »
+2
The first of 3 CSX Pride In Service units arrived on the sub today.  CSX 3194, Honoring Our Law Enforcement.  My first Broadway Limited unit, Paragon 4.



wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6727
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1656
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #388 on: February 03, 2023, 01:35:43 AM »
0
Is it just because they are white, or are those stanchions huge?
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #389 on: February 03, 2023, 01:42:52 AM »
0
I think it's a little bit of both.