Author Topic: GOEMON Couplers...  (Read 2357 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

strummer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 998
  • Respect: +65
GOEMON Couplers...
« on: March 06, 2019, 11:35:17 AM »
0
 This product was briefly mentioned in the long thread regarding MT's True-Scale release, but I can't find much additional info about these.

Although they're a bit expensive, it seems they would look great on the front end of F-units, etc., and look to be a "drop in" replacement for "full size" MTs...

Does anyone here have any experiences with these?

Mark in Oregon
« Last Edit: March 07, 2019, 11:44:40 PM by GaryHinshaw »

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11131
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +654
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2019, 12:40:19 PM »
0


learmoia

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4265
  • Gender: Male
  • ......
  • Respect: +1084
    • Ian does Model Railroad stuff on Youtube.
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2019, 02:42:24 PM »
0
I've got 10 pair, they are an exact copy of 1015 couples with realistic knukle detail.. I'll post some pics tonight..

The mfg is supposedly in Japan, and have arranged with a US Ebay seller for sole US distribution.. (may has changed since I bought mine.)

All you get is the top and bottom half of a coupler on a sprue.. you supply your own trip pin spring and box.

Knukle size is about the same as MT.. and same design gives full slinky effect.

~Ian
« Last Edit: March 06, 2019, 02:44:24 PM by learmoia »

strummer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 998
  • Respect: +65
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2019, 03:28:10 PM »
+1
Mark,

It's GOEMON  ;)

See here: https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=41566.0

Mark

...  :facepalm: ...

Sorry; I guess I flipped a couple of letters...I don't deserve to be on The Railwire!  :)

Mark in Oregon

PS: Thanks for the link to the previous discussion...
« Last Edit: March 06, 2019, 10:35:10 PM by strummer »

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33311
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5546
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2019, 04:34:44 PM »
0
I swiped bunch of photos from the eBay listing - see my gallery: https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?action=gallery;su=user;cat=860;u=2700

Here is one:


Very nice looking couplers (although not any smaller than MTL).  BUt much better than Scale Trains, McHenry, or Bachmann Boxing Gloves.

Very cleanly molded too - MTL quality!
. . . 42 . . .

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3279
  • Respect: +511
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2019, 06:23:50 PM »
0
I've got 10 pair, they are an exact copy of 1015 couples with realistic knukle detail.. I'll post some pics tonight..

The mfg is supposedly in Japan, and have arranged with a US Ebay seller for sole US distribution.. (may has changed since I bought mine.)

All you get is the top and bottom half of a coupler on a sprue.. you supply your own trip pin spring and box.

Knukle size is about the same as MT.. and same design gives full slinky effect.

~Ian

So how do they operate?

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6759
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1675
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2019, 06:28:43 PM »
0
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33311
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5546
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2019, 06:52:32 PM »
0
So how do they operate?

I have not tested mine yet - their geometry is the same as standard N scale MTL couplers, so they should operate just as well as MTL (coupled to themselves or to MT couplers).  And of course they will slink.  :)  One of these days I will do a write-up on them (once I get to that project, unless someone beats me to it).  ;)
. . . 42 . . .

learmoia

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4265
  • Gender: Male
  • ......
  • Respect: +1084
    • Ian does Model Railroad stuff on Youtube.
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2019, 08:00:17 PM »
0
I have not tested mine yet - their geometry is the same as standard N scale MTL couplers, so they should operate just as well as MTL (coupled to themselves or to MT couplers).  And of course they will slink.  :)  One of these days I will do a write-up on them (once I get to that project, unless someone beats me to it).  ;)

Dito.. mine are still in the baggie..

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3279
  • Respect: +511
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2019, 09:12:13 PM »
0
Lol

strummer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 998
  • Respect: +65
Re: GEOMON Couplers...
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2019, 10:27:32 PM »
0
I have not tested mine yet - their geometry is the same as standard N scale MTL couplers, so they should operate just as well as MTL (coupled to themselves or to MT couplers).  And of course they will slink.  :)  One of these days I will do a write-up on them (once I get to that project, unless someone beats me to it).  ;)

I for one look forward to hearing what you have to say about them; they certainly look nice...

Mark in Oregon

Maletrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3612
  • Respect: +644
Re: GOEMON Couplers...
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2019, 10:22:58 AM »
0
They do look better.  Now, if they will only make them in Z scale - -  and those are still compatible with MTL Z and N scale couplers.

jcox3751

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 61
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +7
Re: GOEMON Couplers...
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2019, 11:35:35 AM »
0
THose look like 1025 replacements not 1015.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33311
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5546
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: GOEMON Couplers...
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2019, 01:40:29 PM »
+1
THose look like 1025 replacements not 1015.

Yes, the centering spring is behind the retaining post, so they are a replacement for 1023/1025, and any other coupler constructed that way with centered shank.
. . . 42 . . .