0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Like:Post WWII Streamline passenger trainsIndustrial switch movesYard switchingUnit Long Coal Trains (and "stone" (limestone), and ore in regular hoppers)add long reefer blocksadd express trains using baggage and express cars with a rider coach on the endadd local passenger trains that have steam locomotivesadd caboosesDon't Like:High speed piggy back trains (TOFC in the 70's or Containers later)Unit Grain TrainsInterurban (electric or doodlebugs)MOW movesOre Trains Commuter Trains that use RDCsadd FREDsDon't like or dislike:Narrow Gauge
Wow, well there's some difference of opinion.It's hard to say what I don't like, but here's some comments:I like 'em long and longer, and with lots of power, that's the N scale advantage. Nothing sillier looking than a Class-1 single locomotive with a short unit train consist of a few mixed coal cars or 10 double-stack platforms.I still can't get used to not having cabooses it's like ending sentences without aI like almost anything where it's obvious there's been some real research effort involved to get there by the modeler, be it historic passenger consists, a 50+ car modern unit train done up right, a circus train, or a period-accurate steam freight. Teach me something with your work I didn't know before. I know 'modelers license' and 'its my railroad', but I do appreciate work to an historic level.I'm not a big fan of 'special run' cars, foobie MT schemes, billboard beer cars, state cars, and other 'collectable but fantasy' stuff. It better exist in real life for me to really respect it.I'm a huge fan of passenger trains where cars have been painted and detailed to match a real consist (you know who you are!!!)I absolutely love N steam when taken to the accuracy and detail levels it's been show here, switching, passenger, anything. And whatever it is, I like to see it as it really was, either clean, or weathered to abuse levels.
And whatever it is, I like to see it as it really was, either clean, or weathered to abuse levels.