Author Topic: BLI USRA 2-8-2  (Read 14925 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

k27463

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 94
  • Respect: +33
BLI USRA 2-8-2
« on: December 10, 2018, 04:40:40 PM »
0
Broadway just dropped a photo on their Facebook page...

I guess I'm in for a few of these depending on what roads they produce.


[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
« Last Edit: December 11, 2018, 06:13:20 AM by GaryHinshaw »

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33035
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5364
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2018, 04:45:43 PM »
0
Wow!  Another Mikado!  And it is not PRR prototype - generic baby! How cool!  :|
. . . 42 . . .

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18412
  • Respect: +5700
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2018, 05:09:12 PM »
+3
Biggest waste of tooling ever!


Kentuckian

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 900
  • Gender: Male
  • "This all started with Romans 10:9!" -Apologetix
  • Respect: +496
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2018, 05:29:04 PM »
0
Hmmm. If they also have a Vandy tender, maybe.
Modeling the C&O in Kentucky.

“Nature does not know extinction; all it knows is transformation. ... Everything science has taught me-and continues to teach me-strengthens my belief in the continuity of our spiritual existence after death. Nothing disappears without a trace.” Wernher von Braun

Cajonpassfan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5393
  • Respect: +1961
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2018, 06:17:48 PM »
0
Great, another heavy USRA mike.  :facepalm:
Of all the possible steam locos to do, let's do one we already have.
To me, the only good news here, and it is good, is that BLI keeps betting on N scale steam and appears to have gotten their new electronics into a much smaller package. That bodes well for other, smaller power...
Otto K.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2018, 06:19:35 PM by Cajonpassfan »

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3456
  • Respect: +351
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2018, 06:22:32 PM »
0
Road names would be cool, beside GN.
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4083
  • Respect: +1104
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2018, 06:43:46 PM »
0
Ho hum.  So, is it remotely possible to doll one of these up to look Santa Fe ish? (the railroad, not the wheel arrangement) Or should I just forget it and put the bucks into more Kato F units?
Tom D.

I have a mind like a steel trap...a VERY rusty, old steel trap.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33035
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5364
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2018, 07:27:50 PM »
+1
I'm surprised that nobody yet has defended their choice because Kato Mikado has been long out of production, so we can use another one.  :)
. . . 42 . . .

CodyO

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 848
  • Gender: Male
  • Cody Orr-SPF
  • Respect: +194
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2018, 07:40:37 PM »
+2
I'm surprised that nobody yet has defended their choice because Kato Mikado has been long out of production, so we can use another one.  :)

I`d agree plus a new model with all that nice DCC/Sound.


Plus hopefully they`ll make an L1. Though a 2-10-4 would have been awesome
Modeling the Pennsylvania Middle Division in late 1954
             Nothing Will Stop The US Air Force

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3456
  • Respect: +351
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2018, 08:02:38 PM »
0
This is one I may actually consider buying depending on the road names. The others were cool, but to east coast specific for me.
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

muktown128

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 936
  • Respect: +108
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2018, 08:05:14 PM »
0
Plus hopefully they`ll make an L1. Though a 2-10-4 would have been awesome

Agreed.  I would really like to see a 2-10-4.  The PRR brass ones are quite pricey when they appear on eBay.  As a bonus, the 2-10-4 could be decorated in roads other than PRR to satisfy the non-SPF foamers. 

Hopefully BLI keeps churning out new steam.  1 or 2 new steamers a year would be pretty awesome.

Scott

prr7161

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 284
  • Respect: +113
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2018, 08:07:16 PM »
0
I actually thought their next steam project might be an NYC J1 Hudson - but I will second the notion that this is a good thing for them to keep cranking out N scale steam.  I could probably scrounge enough Kato Mikes from eBay for the P&LE, but it never hurts to have options!
Angela Sutton



The Mon Valley in N Scale

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18412
  • Respect: +5700
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2018, 08:08:57 PM »
0
Thought they were doing a PRR 2-8-0.


daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6350
  • Respect: +1321
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2018, 08:28:38 PM »
0
Yeah, this is a good choice. the USRA heavy Mike is the GP9 of the steam world. Plenty if room for everyone.

The Riv version is old as dirt and the mechanism was not really good (I like the shell though).

Kato made, what two runs? And that's it.

MP/MRC is the light version.

So, yes, I think there is plenty of room for a well detailed good running heavy 2-8-2.

Just curious, would the shell work for a 4-6-2 as well?
There's a shyness found in reason
Apprehensive influence swallow away
You seem to feel abysmal take it
Then you're careful grace for sure
Kinda like the way you're breathing
Kinda like the way you keep looking away

VonRyan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3083
  • Gender: Male
  • Running on fumes
  • Respect: +641
Re: BLI USRA 2-8-2
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2018, 08:47:06 PM »
0
Thought they were doing a PRR 2-8-0.

Them doing a PRR H-class in N requires a much bigger shoehorn to fit their flawed HO decoders into such a small tender.

Apparently all that "Rolling Thunder" nonsense takes up a lot of room, hence why their N-scale offerings have been larger locomotives. And that is precisely what Ken Sylvestri told me.
When I then posed the thought that perhaps they could just exclude the "Rolling Thunder" so that they could offer the H-class in N, Ken just got more uppity and dismissive.

It was at that point that I swore off ever buying any BLI product as new. If I ever own anything BLI it'll be either inherited or bought secondhand (and promptly gutted of it's inferior decoder and suitably upgraded with more appropriate hardware).
Cody W Fisher  —  Wandering soul from a bygone era.
Tired.
Fighting to reclaim shreds of the past.