0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Oh come on Peteski, a couple of down votes keeps you on your toes, you can spare them. Let the sad individual feel like he has be an achiever. You are just too sensitive under that boiler plated exterior, and Bob you are such a kill joy. ps it is not me, only once have I voted some one down, I was infuriated by their attitude. I am happy to put my name to a vote, if requested.
I'm assuming that your post was serious.It is not about my vote count or being sensitive - it is is about the principal of the thing. I stand up for myself! And if I am raining on someone's acrid need to down-vote posts (while hiding their identity behind a computer screen) for apparently no good or valid reason, I'm not sorry about that. Being an achiever in mischief or in being a miserable person is not something anybody should strive for. Sounds like you vote for logical reasons so you wouldn't mind being identified. Others might not like being exposed for their negative votes.
I just gave you a down vote for no good of valid reason!
I can't decide whether to up or down vote this.
The Railwire is not your personal army.
Well, I came here to learn about cell phones getting decent shots. How silly of me Otto K.
Well, seeing that it has a typo in that "1" instead of a fourth exclamation point, I suggest a downvote. DFF
I would like to see a brief reason explaining a negative vote attached to the negative vote before it was able to be applied, to move away from the bitchiness that has developed and make voters more accountable. This is now sounding messy .......... bet I get voted down for it ..........