0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
They could make money if they contracted this service. Let one of the fast food companies do it and they would both likely make a profit.
...$9.50 for a cheeseburger is wrong, it's only like $5 if I remember from my trip down to DC for the Susquehanna Limited,Phil
Hmm... maybe it's a bluecheeseburger... gourmetpricing and all...
If it comes from a member of Congress I would take it with a HUGE grain of salt. Not trying to be political, but they have been known to "cook the books" to take the soapbox.
I also have to wonder how these arguments account for the fact that long distance sleeping car passengers pay for their meals as part of their accommodation charge. It would be very easy to discount those meals as "freebies".As an example, if the CZ averages only one passenger per room in the two sleepers per train that they're running these days, that is 42 passengers per train who are getting "free" meals. With service including lunch and dinner on the first day; breakfast, lunch, and dinner on the second day; and breakfast and lunch on the third day, that's 7 meals per passenger per trip from Emeryville to Chicago. That's 294 meals per trip that required a cook, server, and diner supervisor that are "free" to the passenger, but "expensive" to AMTRAK. Given the capacity of the superliner sleepers, that number could potentially go as high as 686 "free" meals per trip.It's easy to see how that could jack up the "average loss" on meal service system-wide if they don't account for the fact that those meals are paid for as part of the accommodation charge.