0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You return to this theme more often than not, and it seems you're perturbed because you want the higher-end models at 1980 prices.
For fifty years there has been the "whoa up" line that manufacturers try not to cross. You make it sound as if 2012 is different than 1972. It's not. More sophisticated and more specific targeting of the consumer base perhaps. But there's always been a balance between price-point and saleability that has to be observed.The ability exists today to target a specific model for a specific segment of the consumer base. To believe that your personal perception of $40 MSRP exceeding the boundaries of reasonable pricing is the general perception is nothing more than you projecting. The Red Caboose auto racks pushed the $40 mark five years or so ago, by far the most expensive N scale freight car on average at the time, and it was their best-selling N scale model ever. The RC model is significantly better than the MTL version in numerous areas (design, detail, ride-height), yet the average MSRP of the MTL version isn't much less. But both models (and the MTL open racks) far exceed the quality of the auto rack models introduced in the late 1960s. The Arnold, Bachmann and Roco models (and the Con-Cor model from the 1980s) are clearly toy-like juxtaposed with the RC and MTL models.As I indicated up-thread, there are plenty of Trainman-level items available on the market for those who feel newer items are out of their price range. You return to this theme more often than not, and it seems you're perturbed because you want the higher-end models at 1980 prices. That simply isn't going to happen. If you want the models that are better detailed and more accurate to the prototype, then you have to allow that such features are more costly than the crudely-detailed models tooled in the 1970s.One other point to note - over the last decade or so there has been far far far more turnover of N scale product than ever before, which has resulted in a greater amount of models being introduced. So it appears the current model is working.
... I need not buy another engine or car in either HO or N..I have more then enough.
Another issue I think about lately is how much *my* time is worth. IOW, how many hours would it take me to bash/detail/paint a model, when a better-quality model is available in this case??? Frank
Atlas very easily could have commanded more for this strongly-desired prototype if they had chosen to do so.
Then you don't need to worry about it!
Seriously? And they didn't because....?
I need not buy another engine or car in either HO or N..I have more then enough.
I didn't say I wasn't going to buy another car or engine.
I guess the real problem is in their hands..IF those higher price PS1s turns out to be slow sellers I suspect it will be a long dry spill on the Trainman PS1-until Atlas has their ROI for the newly tooled car..
The thing I am seeing is the HO guys are indeed saying "whoa up" to the higher price cars and to a degree some RTR locomotives
From my personal sales experience, I'd day this definitely isn't the case, even in the midst of this poor economy. I've sold a good number of Exactrail cars that cost a pretty penny, even when a 25% discount is offered; as well as plenty of Tangent cars very close to full MSRP because not every dealer carries them. Seems as long as the quality of a model justifies it's price point, the model will sell. Bryan's X58s are a PRIME example of that.