0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
As one who long pined for my own favorite units, I do hope you get the units in the schemes you want. Trust me, RF&P isn't esasy to find (althogh better since Atlas of late).
I would disagree with the use of "obscure". The MP36/MPXpress is THE 2000's-2020's modern era commuter/passenger locomotive in the United States. It's the modern F40, and is in use by just about every meaningful passenger agency outside of New York, which is a special case (electrified lines and non-locomotive trains, and a stock of older GE units for Metro North capable of duel-mode operations). Going forward, I'd expect to see more in use, and widespread use as commuter rail continues to grow steadily and come to places not currently served, and as the bigger angencies retire their older units for newer, fuel efficient and environmenally more-friendly power.METRA is also hardly what I'd call obscure either, being the #2 agency in the United States, serving the #2 City in the United States, with something like 300,000 riders experiencing these every day. VRE, on the other hand, I agree....obscure is rather accurate, 20,000 riders a day for us, another 35,000 for MARC on the other side of DC, although we do have the 3rd largest U.S. inventory of MP36's at 20 units (behind METRA and MARC). With 13 agencies currently running MP36's, and more in the pipeline, and the public having direct personal experience seeing and riding these units, and given Kato's interest in being ahead in "modern era" and passenger equipment, it's no shock they decided to get on the MP36 before somone else did. They'll be lots of roadnames (eventually) and lots of schemes (for collectors), and lots of cities covered, so modern modellers and modellers down the road doing (the late 2000's thru 2020 or so) will have lots of options for their favorite big city.I won't claim the 36' would be "better" than some alternative freight rail option (plenty of holes in availabillity there), but I'm glad to see modellers who desire one won't have to wait 30 years for it like they did for a decent F40 model. Of course, I AM biased.As one who long pined for my own favorite units, I do hope you get the units in the schemes you want. Trust me, RF&P isn't esasy to find (althogh better since Atlas of late).
The Maxi-Is will be a staple on my layout if:1) they ever get delivered (my pre-order for the first set dates to Sep 2010)2) it (my layout) ever gets built.
Kato's answer to all of us who think they have a western bias: Bring out obscure passenger locomotives and cars, and of course more roadnames on the GG1. Meanwhile, every eastern railroad that had a U30C, C30-7 or an SD40-2 doesn't get represented.
Or SD45.
I just wish Kato would sell them without the containers. I've already got a big pile of containers and I don't need to pay extra for more containers that I don't need.
Wow, so they do a CR GG1 and it's a one off that only wore the scheme for a few months (if not days), and it's the wrong body style to boot.I don't want to be so harsh on Kato, but...
The bicentennial scheme is sure to sell to the masses and is certainly in keeping with Kato's business model. As I have a recently purchased Pennsy single stripe G waiting under the tree I'm OK with passing on the bicentennial. I'd be tempted to buy the blue 4800 even with the wrong body. Preference is for a DGLE single-stripe CR paint-out.
That might be the only reason I buy the current broad-stripe scheme, since the lettering and numbers are totally wrong. They got it right on the red units, but doubt they'll be revisiting the scheme in green anytime soon. A shame, because that should have been their best seller if the scheme was correct.