Author Topic: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.  (Read 1265 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18395
  • Respect: +5666
Re: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2024, 10:04:00 AM »
+1

chessie system fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1156
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +656
Re: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2024, 10:59:12 AM »
0
I actually completely forgot about that one !  :facepalm: I wonder what the driver spacing is. And I'm skeptical about the weight that overhangs the drivers. The Pennsy electric has a gap between the running gear and the cab, so that could be a lot of milling.
Aaron Bearden

chessie system fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1156
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +656
Re: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2024, 11:59:42 AM »
0
Last night I went back through the TP56 thread from a few years ago.  Unless a better idea comes along, I'm leaning towards the original idea in the thread of using a Kato truck with a Kato 11-105 critter motor for a couple of reasons.

https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=42126.0
https://store.katousa.com/product/gg1-powered-truck-with-drive-shaft-silver-n-scale/

1. The parts are readily available.
2. And cheaper than a steam engine drive (and slightly less than the Bachmann parts too).
3. I'm certain (though can't confirm until I get the parts) that the critter drive shaft with the ball joint will just snap into the GG1 worm tower.
4. Lower friction and better pickup than the Bachmann wiper drive.

https://estore.bachmanntrains.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=70_701

5. The smaller Kato motor leaves more room for weight.
6. It should be possible to 3D print parts that are a snap-fit replacement for the kato side frames.

Aaron Bearden

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32950
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5338
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.
« Reply #18 on: July 30, 2024, 09:41:26 AM »
0
Yeah, the valve gear does look better on the Fleischmann.  Unfortunately,my eye is drawn to that massive Rapido coupler up front!!   :o

Well, that is still the de-facto N scale coupler standard outside of the USA. Even Kato's Japanese offerings use rapido couplers.   I know, that doesn't make it look any better, but it is what it is.  For more refined modelers most European prototype models have standardized coupler pocket, so a slightly smaller "profi" couplers can be swapped simply by pulling the rapido out and snapping the profi coupler in.

Remember that European railroads still use link and hook coupler along with sprung buffers, not knuckle couplers, so there isn't anything viable to make a working scale hook/link coupler.
. . . 42 . . .

randgust

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2758
  • Respect: +2262
    • Randgust N Scale Kits
Re: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2024, 01:14:51 PM »
0
Last night I went back through the TP56 thread from a few years ago.  Unless a better idea comes along, I'm leaning towards the original idea in the thread of using a Kato truck with a Kato 11-105 critter motor for a couple of reasons.


https://store.katousa.com/product/gg1-powered-truck-with-drive-shaft-silver-n-scale/


Holy forehead slap, Batman.... that's the best of both worlds.  I used a Roco E-unit truck on my TP56 just to get that offset gearbox to leave room for the motor.  Ron used a center truck tower and made it work.   But that old Roco truck had real issues and I'd never do that again.  I'd use the Kato truck but a lot more difficult to fit.

Now, since you very well might have the solution here for both, depends what you want to do with it.   If it really is a low-speed switcher, consider putting in a 3V Solarbotics 25:1 GM51A gearhead instead of the 11-105 critter motor, which has relatively low torque and high speed.  I've changed all my critter motors out to this in my Climax A's built on Kato critter chassis.   You drill out the end of the motor shaft, put in a scrap of .030 rod, and ACC in the universal from the critter.  Then shorten the driveshaft with a splice to about as short as you can.  I have directions.     With a 100-ohm resistor, the draw is so light that the torque load is negligible.  You get about 25mph flat out screamin'.

I love these things, cheap, easy to work with, high torque, low current, if you can make it fit.
https://www.solarbotics.com/product/gm15a

Ron did a great job, but half the problems he had was fitting a motor in with a centered tower.   I thought i'd beaten that with an end tower, but the truck quality about drove me bonkers.   Gearheads are your friends, but only possible with an end tower.

My other 'ultimate gearhead' was putting a Gizmoszone 5.14:1 gearhead mounted on a Kato 12V critter motor, did that on all my Whitcombs, and two tender-drive steam locomotive conversions, and my own TP56 (below).  Sadly, Gizmoszone vaporized from Hong Kong, and any attempts to find the manufacturer of those wonderful little gearheads (Marswell?  Somebody else?) failed



Link:  http://www.randgust.com/TP5608.jpg

If I'd done that same approach using a Kato quality truck I never would have sold it.



« Last Edit: July 30, 2024, 01:42:49 PM by randgust »

chessie system fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1156
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +656
Re: Bachmann 2-6-0 vs 4-6-0 mechanism questions.
« Reply #20 on: July 30, 2024, 01:41:13 PM »
0
Great idea, Randy. 

I also found this available.  The wheelbase is correct, but I think the drivers are a little small for this electric.  It could perhaps be used for other projects.

http://www.narrow-garage.com/NGCPower.html
Aaron Bearden