Author Topic: ISO: Trinity 5161 Hopper Prototype Drawings  (Read 726 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4771
  • Respect: +1695
ISO: Trinity 5161 Hopper Prototype Drawings
« on: May 23, 2020, 12:37:51 PM »
0
Can anyone please point me at any drawings, detailed pics, and/or other kinds of dimensional info for the Trinity 5161 cuft. grain hopper?   I'm doing a bit of proto research so any kind of info would be helpful.

One of my priorities is to figure out the dimensions of the corner angles and other elements of the end cages.  I've looked thru the David Casdorph articles in the old MRG 2003 series, which are informative but regrettably do not have any actual drawings.

Thanks in advance,
Ed

Super_G

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 72
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +90
Re: ISO: Trinity 5161 Hopper Prototype Drawings
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2020, 08:18:04 PM »
0
Here is a diagram from BNSF's website for the 5161.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Rivet Miscounter

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 764
  • Respect: +385
Re: ISO: Trinity 5161 Hopper Prototype Drawings
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2020, 08:35:35 PM »
0
One idea is look at the models...I would think they're reasonably close?  (or maybe they're not and you're trying to fix them?)

Here's an HO undec: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Trinity-5161-cf-Covered-Hopper-12-Course-Undecorated-Athearn-Genesis-HO-G4290/283882114360?hash=item4218b14d38:g:L6kAAOSwo-5ePiIU    There are some N but figure easier to get dimensions off the larger scales.   There's a 4-pack of Atlas O in BNSF, but at $600 that dips into the research budget quite a bit.   8)

Anyway, I would actually be interested in detailed drawings/plans too.   Would love to get these in Z-scale.
Doug

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4771
  • Respect: +1695
Re: ISO: Trinity 5161 Hopper Prototype Drawings
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2020, 11:25:12 PM »
+1
Here is a diagram from BNSF's website for the 5161.

Great, that's exactly what I had in mind!  Thanks!

One idea is look at the models...I would think they're reasonably close?  (or maybe they're not and you're trying to fix them?)

Yes, the latter.  The Atlas O model is a good base, but it has a lot of inaccuracies and compromises, particularly around the bolsters and end cages.

Ed