0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Um, I thought the problem was SHIPPERS complaining, not the railroads. As I understand it, the prohibition is on RAILROAD-owned cars bearing graphics for other companies. Great for the railroads because advertising revenue. Not so great for the shipper when they get a car decorated for their competitor to ship their stuff in. (Think Coke receiving a railroad-supplied car all decorated for PepsiCo.)If the shipper owns or leases the car, they're quite in the right to put their own name and logo on that car.
Exactly.... The Sargento car was a WSOR initialed car, right....There have been other examples though, I suspect that in modern times, no one cares and the Sargento car was repainted because itwas grafitti covered or something.
No, Chris has it right. The logo had to be removed and it wasn't graffiti related.
I wasn't disagreeing with Chris - I said "exactly"... But I am implying there is a FINE LINE between WSOR being ordered to repaint the car, and their marketing peoplesaying "you know, that promotion is over, let's repaint it" and it becoming a railfan rumor that they were ordered to.I just find it hard to believe in this day and age this is enforced. And in fact it isn't - SRY has cars with advertising, I believe and there are others...
For some reason Southern Railway of British Columbia gets away with this though:http://canadianfreightcargallery.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=sry9461&o=sryUnless these cars are specifically assigned to serving that shipper?