Author Topic: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar  (Read 2765 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4815
  • Respect: +1758
SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« on: January 05, 2011, 07:09:49 PM »
0
Hi everyone, just thought I start the New Year with posting this Athearn PCF boxcar.   I've had this in the works for a while (languishing, actually) but recently found some time to finish & photograph it.  The re-stencil and initial fade are from the factory, I added some fade along with the rest of the weathering effects.    As always, please let me know your comments!

Ed





While this is not a true proto effort, I did use the following as inspirations:

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/pictures%5C24157%5CXM%20SSW%2022987%20100707.JPG
http://www.railcarphotos.com/pix/25/SSW%2023793_Stockton%20CA_Rob%20Sarberenyi_2007-09-26_25543.jpg


Thanks!   ;)

Ed

noblerot

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 72
  • Gender: Male
  • Southern Tier in N scale, NYSW Conrail LASB NJT
  • Respect: 0
    • Picassa Albums
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2011, 07:27:34 PM »
0
my 2 cents, it looks very real. Fantastic job
Alan Jannone
Shohola PA

esa123

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 109
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: 0
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2011, 07:48:59 PM »
0
Looks amazing! How did you layer the roof coloring?

Thanks,
Erik

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8911
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2011, 09:59:31 AM »
0
Must.  Pick.  Up.  Jaw.  :o :o :o :o :o :o
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2011, 08:52:34 PM »
0
Ed, that looks pretty good.  I have this same car too - I love the pre-fade (although in this rare case, I would rather have it unfaded to copy that proto photo with the ICH graf).

BTW - I've been using oils for graf due to their ability to take longer to dry and hence settle down and not look thick and textured.  Here is one I'm working in n scale (looks a little sloppy at this magnification):


elogger

  • Guest
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2011, 11:46:29 PM »
0

BTW - I've been using oils for graf due to their ability to take longer to dry and hence settle down and not look thick and textured. 



Tom,

I couldn't agree more. Oils, to me, are much easier to do tags with.


Jeremy

amato1969

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1363
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +892
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2011, 02:25:40 PM »
0
Excellent work, fellas.  You have certainly raised the bar on realistic tagging!

  Frank

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4815
  • Respect: +1758
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2011, 10:47:21 PM »
0
Say Tom, is that the 'real' oils or the water-based ones?

Ed

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2011, 10:08:01 PM »
0
They are still oil based, but use linseed oil which is water soluble.  They dry faster than regular oils, but not as fast as acrylics. 


fnava1987

  • Guest
Re: SSW 23783 PCF Boxcar
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2011, 06:47:21 AM »
0
how much would u charge to do something like that?