« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Howard Zane's Piermont Division  (Read 2374 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13386
  • Respect: +3245
Howard Zane's Piermont Division
« on: May 05, 2007, 06:24:48 PM »
0
« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 06:32:52 PM by John »
Logged

nscalesteve

  • Guest
Re: Howard Zane's Piermont Division
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2007, 10:15:09 PM »
0
nice !!  -  what is it, H0 or bigger... ?
Logged

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13386
  • Respect: +3245
Re: Howard Zane's Piermont Division
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2007, 10:15:45 PM »
0
Quote from: nscalesteve on May 05, 2007, 10:15:09 PM
nice !!  -  what is it, H0 or bigger... ?

HO
Logged

MrKLUKE

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 847
  • Respect: +5
.
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2007, 12:44:19 AM »
0
.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2016, 12:02:34 PM by MrKLUKE »
Logged

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16124
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6467
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: Howard Zane's Piermont Division
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2007, 09:01:24 PM »
0
The level of detail is a good example of why George Sellios can be considered over-done.  Howard seems to do a better job of balancing scenery, details and trains.

Lee
Logged
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13386
  • Respect: +3245
Re: Howard Zane's Piermont Division
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2007, 09:05:16 PM »
0
The only thing I don't like is the 3 mainlines stacked one above the other .. while its possible in one or two locations .. its unlikely that a whole railroad would parallel another for long distances ..(yea .. B&O / WM)  much less 2 others .. I would like to see more separation ..  but .. thats just me .. otherwise, its in a league of its own ..
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »