0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I wouldn't assume that BLI is intentionally being difficult, it's just that they have never really considered the use case.
How much of it could be allowing the factory to do what is easier for them? Path of least resistance to get products timely. You always hear stories of companies fighting with China on little things.
There's even a phrase for it: "Cha Bu Duo"
. . . Odds are that I'm not going to connect the cab lighting (why is it a feature?*) since I'd like to reserve the additional lighting lead for the yellow beacon that was on a small handful of ATSF -15s in the late '60s.* - This gets into the whole toy vs. model "thing" with BLI. This is a nice model. But when it comes to pointless gewgaws, just because "you can" doesn't mean "you should". If they wanted to do something useful in the way of a whiz-bang function, they could have illuminated the marker lights.
A function for the number boards? Didn't most railroads leave them on all the time, or at least whenever the headlight was on?CBQ Fan: Probably. Sound decoders take a lot of voltage for "overhead", before the loco starts moving. I have an Athearn Challenger that won't even RUN on my layout, because my throttle's top voltage isn't high enough!(Yes, I need a higher input voltage for it, but my DC diesels and electrics run fine, so why bother to change? I model 1974, so wouldn't have a Challenger anyway)
I downloaded the LokPilot/LokSound 5 manual, and it explicitly states 12.5VDC on the lighting common (blue) for all versions. There is some discussion in the manual about accommodating European models with incandescent lighting and possible accessories such as remote control uncoupling on the F-function lines. They spec 470Ω resistors which at 27mA is pretty hot for SMD LEDs, IMO. I have 680Ω 0603 chips on the way, but they're still going to be super-bright; after tests last night I'm tempted to do 1K instead to tone it down a little.