Author Topic: [Kato USA Tech Corner] - 1st look - N FEF-3 #844 Steam Locomotive - Video.....  (Read 2551 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chulvis

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3436
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +5
    • http://www.featherrivertrains.com
« Last Edit: September 21, 2014, 10:49:34 AM by GaryHinshaw »



Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8927
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1665
    • Layout Progress Blog
0
from a diesel guy - that's one fab steamer.  can't wait for it to make its BANTRAK appearance.
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8897
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4718
    • www.bbussey.net
0
Pretty neat.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net


Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18414
  • Respect: +5700
0
For such a big loco the model seems pretty simple. I like the bulked up draw bar so you don't see light under the firebox. And I love that a bunch of electronics aren't forced to be able to own one.

It is really sad I have no use at all for this.  :|  Would like to see what NP loco Max will turn it into.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2014, 04:30:03 PM by Chris333 »

Kisatchie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +62
0
I can't believe I watched all 9 minutes and 29 seconds of the video. I'm glad I'm modeling 1971, otherwise I might want one of those locos.


Hmm... uh, Kiz, the loco
is still in service...


Two scientists create a teleportation ray, and they try it out on a cricket. They put the cricket on one of the two teleportation pads in the room, and they turn the ray on.
The cricket jumps across the room onto the other pad.
"It works! It works!"

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3133
  • Respect: +1512
0
I can't believe I watched all 9 minutes and 29 seconds of the video. I'm glad I'm modeling 1971, otherwise I might want one of those locos.


Hmm... uh, Kiz, the loco
is still in service...



This loco, along with an appropriate excursion train, would fit perfectly in your time period.  Now, if your road never allowed the 844 (8444) to run on its rails, that might be a different qualifier.

Kisatchie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +62
0
This loco, along with an appropriate excursion train, would fit perfectly in your time period.  Now, if your road never allowed the 844 (8444) to run on its rails, that might be a different qualifier.

I guess I'll have to write a rule book for my Kisatchie, Gulf & Northern railroad, then. I wonder if I'll allow the loco on KG&N rails...  :ashat:


Hmm... I'm bettin' "no"...

Two scientists create a teleportation ray, and they try it out on a cricket. They put the cricket on one of the two teleportation pads in the room, and they turn the ray on.
The cricket jumps across the room onto the other pad.
"It works! It works!"

sdodge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 214
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: -1
0
Hmm...I might have to re-think my diesel only policy! Maybe a visitor/excursion train on the Nevada City Southern shortline.

learmoia

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4220
  • Gender: Male
  • ......
  • Respect: +1044
    • Ian does Model Railroad stuff on Youtube.
0
I watched the video.. and this thing looks like it could be a HUGE success on a superbly designed model..

Like the Prototype.. The model appears to stand as the pinnacle of N scale steam locomotive design and execution.

I just wish I had reason to buy one.. :(

~Ian

delamaize

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2405
  • Gender: Male
  • Prairie Line Native
  • Respect: +551
0
Great. Now I have to buy one.  :facepalm:
Mike

Northern Pacific, Tacoma Division, 4th subdivision "The Prarie Line" (still in planning stages)

Nato

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2302
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +159
0
 :|        My only complaint is that the Oil Bunker is the current modern one also now on 3985 and for the time period Kato said the locomotive represented the old type bunker mainly just a fuel fill and a vent would be used. The viedo showing inside the tender would indicate that the bunker is molded as part of the body. If so too bad if it were removeable ,think Athearn, then you could install or fabricate and old style one or even a coal bunker. Otherwise the pilot model is really impressive. Nate Goodman (Nato). Salt Lake, Utah.

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3133
  • Respect: +1512
0
I've looked at the video frame by frame, and there appears to be fixtures on the inside under the oil bunker on the inside that may indicate the top of the oil bunker is snapped on and is a separate piece.  I can't tell for sure, but it looks like this may be the case (and I hope it is).  Perhaps further info coming out of Kato USA will answer this question.