Author Topic: L90 Log Loader  (Read 9730 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cwwrman

  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2013, 11:59:47 AM »
0
One of the things I am trying to figure out is how many people will commit to buying one if WoT decides to make this. So far, I have about 20 spoken for. I have a thread on trainboard that I asked how many people were interested and also e mailed people I personally know within the hobby. I have only been working on this with WoT for about a week now. I figure if I can get say 100 spoken for, that maybe they will decide to make this model.

Lets hope
Ryan

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6728
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2013, 01:26:59 PM »
0
I'd be inclined to think that there are an equal number of logging related N Scale modelers as intermodal modelers.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


cwwrman

  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2013, 01:37:39 PM »
0
I'd be inclined to think that there are an equal number of logging related N Scale modelers as intermodal modelers.

I would think so too Bryan, but I am not getting nearly as much traction on this on trainboard as I would think, if that would be the case. I really hope that I can get WoT to at least produce the grapples seperately. If not, I guess I might be going into the resin casting business. And if that is the case, you will more than likely see other lumber related things that I am working on currently like 40ft chip trailers, chip bunkers, and a trailer loader in the future.

Ryan
« Last Edit: March 23, 2013, 01:45:34 PM by cwwrman »

Nilmadic

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 81
  • Respect: 0
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2013, 01:48:33 PM »
0
Having already scratch built one set of forks, I suppose I would buy one from WoT, Provided that it was positionable. I did not make the hydraulics on the grapple functional on my model. The hydraulic ram is soldiered brass tube. The Grapple can be positioned open and I can insert a different brass tube to hold it open statically. This was so logs don't fall out of the forks when I load it up. I

I finally painted the forks and have some LED's installed. I still need to add an LED floodlight for the rear. I have a TF4 Digitrax decoder to run the lighting off the DCC system. I hadn't really thought about the decoder when I set out to add lighting and I used a minitronics flasher unit, instead of using the lighting effects in the decoder. If I did it again, maybe when I get the WoT one, I will use an LED for the roof beacon instead of a grain of rice lamp and use the FX in the decoder.

I posted this video on a different thread, but I think it should go here.


cwwrman

  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2013, 02:10:43 PM »
0
Finished model looks GREAT!!!!! I was thinking of making the hydraulic rams out of styrene or brass tube with a brass tube in the center to make the ram able to move. I like the diversity of being able to have the grapples opened or closed.

I dont model DCC so a decoder to me would not be needed. However, I would use a MV lens or something to simulate the lights. Maybe even an actual LED that was attached to some type of power source.

As far as a beacon. You do know that Ngeneering makes an actual working beacon dont you? Here is there website.

http://www.ngineering.com/rot-beacon_video.htm

Ryan

Wardie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 395
  • Respect: +34
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #20 on: March 23, 2013, 06:59:59 PM »
0
I have a WoT for the Boston and Maine for intermodal operations, that being said if they did produce the logging version of the model I would by one for my freelanced sawmill operation.

screeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Respect: +7
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #21 on: March 23, 2013, 08:29:25 PM »
0
count me in for one if WoT release complete units - their intermodal loaders look fantastic but I didn't have a need to buy any, and I'll want something to attach to the back of those claws :)

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3541
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2013, 09:03:48 PM »
0
I would need a couple for a sawmill scene on my layout.
Peter Pfotenhauer

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9896
  • Respect: +1446
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #23 on: March 24, 2013, 12:28:45 AM »
0
A completed model would be fine with me.  Depending on finances I may have to limit myself to two, but I doubt the conversions would be cheap.  I'd still have to buy a full Piggy-Packer to go with the extras, as I only have one, so that's probably a wash.  If three are too expensive, I do have a GHQ knuckle-boom loader for my third site.  And, of course, I may actually have the money for three, depending on when they come out.
N Kalanaga
Be well

pmpexpress

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 590
  • Respect: +156
    • Trains N Scale
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #24 on: March 25, 2013, 12:11:30 AM »
+1
One of the things I am trying to figure out is how many people will commit to buying one if WoT decides to make this. So far, I have about 20 spoken for. I have a thread on trainboard that I asked how many people were interested and also e mailed people I personally know within the hobby. I have only been working on this with WoT for about a week now. I figure if I can get say 100 spoken for, that maybe they will decide to make this model.

Lets hope
Ryan

Too modern for me...

Need some smaller, sixties - early eighties era L60 chassis (i.e., like the chassis that were used on N Scale of Nevada's 1960s era Piggy Packers) Lumberjack models.

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9896
  • Respect: +1446
Re: L90 Log Loader
« Reply #25 on: March 25, 2013, 12:37:57 AM »
0
Actually, the L60 would be more in my era, but the logs in my region are big enough to use the L90.  And I'll settle for a slightly too modern loader over none at all...
N Kalanaga
Be well