0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Ian MacMillan on July 19, 2008, 11:47:52 AMI have been using these for years and mentioned them here! Where have you guys been? Or is it because you just moved over to the dark side! ;DI think the topic was raised more because of Sergent's new tooling, which was just announced, than because anyone just discovered Sergent couplers. I don't have any of their older couplers, so I'd be interested to see a direct comparison (their website is a bit short on good marketing information).
I have been using these for years and mentioned them here! Where have you guys been? Or is it because you just moved over to the dark side! ;D
Quote from: David K. Smith on July 19, 2008, 12:27:54 PMQuote from: Ian MacMillan on July 19, 2008, 11:47:52 AMI have been using these for years and mentioned them here! Where have you guys been? Or is it because you just moved over to the dark side! ;DI think the topic was raised more because of Sergent's new tooling, which was just announced, than because anyone just discovered Sergent couplers. I don't have any of their older couplers, so I'd be interested to see a direct comparison (their website is a bit short on good marketing information).Ah. I wonder if the ones in your photos are the new tooling, as they look the same as the old tooling...The only real difference I see is that the parting line on the coupler face has been reduced.
Thanks for posting that, Erik. Doesn't look like any significant changes, aside from opening up the pocket for the spring. Did they use the same ball-bearing before? The holes for it look a little different.
I thought I read the only reason for retooling was to make them easier to mass produce.