Author Topic: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action  (Read 7931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

signalmaintainer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 421
  • Respect: +234
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #105 on: October 16, 2022, 07:01:47 PM »
+1
 
They don't understand that unions are what gave them vacations, cost of living increases, health care and sick leave. 

Frankly, I don't give a damn what the public understands or what their opinions are about us.

I do care that many Americans have paid sick while, ironically, we don't. I do care that conductors and engineers are being treated like expendable commodities with no regard for their family life, and their physical and mental well-being. I do care that we are falling behind financially in high cost of living areas. I do care that we're not being paid commensurate with our responsibilities compared to our counterparts working for public transit, ie, light rail.

We could go on strike but we would be taking a huge risk that we would wind up with an even worse proposal than what is on the table now. 
I seriously doubt we would get anything worse than what the other unions have already agreed to. That's just scare tactics. If we don't stand up now, then when? When it's too late?
« Last Edit: October 16, 2022, 07:03:27 PM by signalmaintainer »
NSMR #1975, RMR #4

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #106 on: October 16, 2022, 10:27:15 PM »
+1
Me too. Even a 24-hour work stoppage will screw things up magnificently and cost the carriers millions over weeks getting things unsnarled. And it will reveal the lie in carriers' stupid statement to the PEB that "labor doesn't contribute to profits."

I STILL cannot believe that the moron who said that is still employed.

I mean, I can believe it. Assholes like that fail upward, but still. If anyone who worked for me said something like that they'd find themselves in a 4:30 meeting with HR that same day.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32957
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5340
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #107 on: October 16, 2022, 11:37:51 PM »
0
I STILL cannot believe that the moron who said that is still employed.

I mean, I can believe it. Assholes like that fail upward, but still. If anyone who worked for me said something like that they'd find themselves in a 4:30 meeting with HR that same day.

With the smart phones omnipresent everywhere, with their capability to record and share videos (and everybody being trigger happy), the number of people (in government, company officials, press, and just average Joes) saying stupid things is pretty much normal and expected.  Politicians are especially prone to putting foot in their mouth, when speaking in public (or even in private), then some careful (and out of context) editing is a perfect fodder for the opposition's ads.  They also often get away with their stupidity. Doesn't surprise me anymore.
. . . 42 . . .

draskouasshat

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 987
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +643
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #108 on: October 17, 2022, 11:16:45 AM »
0
Didn’t realize I had to be a railroader to respond. Sorry, not! No, I am not or was never. I was in senior management of a business for 21 years in a non union environment that each employee negotiated his/her own wage package. Start with a base commission and go from there. That was brutal on both ends of negotiation.

I know all about how Congress has had to intervene to give railroaders a decent living wage but have always fallen below what the unions requested for life, like time off, sick and vacation days. I know Corporate could care less about it’s heart beat, it’s workers. Do you have to be a RR worker to see it. Even with bias media, it is very obvious Corporate feels it’s workforce is disposable. Tell me how a 10,000’ train can be handled safely by one crew member? Hell, why is there a train 10,000’? With less of a workforce there are greater profits. That what media talks about.

Don’t sign the contracts Congress, not the President, will impose. Strike for as many days it takes the President to get involved before saying “national security” and end a strike. Remember, this man in office now is the most friendly towards Unions as we have had in the 2000’s. Do you really want to see a former NYC businessman or a Florida governor helping your Union cause. That will never happen, think hard on that choice.

You want a strike do it. But will your BSR support it? When the President intervenes ignore it. Are they going to arrest every railroad worker or call out the National Guards to run trains or maintain the signals? We know management doesn’t have as many former railroad workers so they won’t be of much use.

Listen, I know you are screwed no matter what happens. Is resistance futile? Maybe but your Unions should try to break this stupid cycle of having Congress handle usually management sided contracts. I can’t image living basically on call for a job while the Corporate money grabbers think you and your brothers and sisters don’t  contribute to profit.

You don’t have to agree to any of what I wrote. That doesn’t and won’t bother me or actually if most are honest here on the Railwire anybody else here. You and other RR workers are on the proverbial island with no way safely off.

My last words on this, do what you feel is right for your family and you. You have my support and best wishes if you do that.

Tom

It's just not the same man. Unions like the UAW and IBEW will go on strike for a month at a time and it doesn't really hurt anyone outside of the members and corporations. The world still goes on. There's a reason the congress created the Railway Labor act. The world, country, and economy depend on US railroads and without it, things crash quickly hence why they basically make it impossible for us to strike. Now, from your senior management perspective, do you see the upper hand that gives the carriers? They basically are letting their buddies in congress do the forced negotiation.
That's why we're ready to let it burn. The companies and government need to recognize that they don't hold all the power.
On a side note, other unions and non-unionized employees were also going to go on strike with us. I've heard of doctors and nurses as well as UPS were going to have a work stoppage with us.

Drasko
Draskos Modelworks. Contact me for your 3D modeling needs!
SFM (Super Fleet Modeler) member #1
I HAVE 3800 class santa fe 2-10-2s!!

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #109 on: October 17, 2022, 12:31:57 PM »
0
With the smart phones omnipresent everywhere, with their capability to record and share videos (and everybody being trigger happy), the number of people (in government, company officials, press, and just average Joes) saying stupid things is pretty much normal and expected.  Politicians are especially prone to putting foot in their mouth, when speaking in public (or even in private), then some careful (and out of context) editing is a perfect fodder for the opposition's ads.  They also often get away with their stupidity. Doesn't surprise me anymore.

No, that line actually appeared in printed testimony before the PEB (page 32).

https://www.trains.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PEB-Recommendation.pdf

Quote

The Carriers maintain that capital investment and risk are the reasons for their profits, not any contributions by labor.

The Carriers further argue that there is no correlation historically between high profits and higher compensation, either in the freight rail industry or more generally.

To the contrary, one of the Carriers’ experts maintained that the most profitable companies are not those whose compensation is the highest.

The Carriers assert that since employees have been fairly and adequately paid for their efforts and do not share in the downside risks if the operations are less profitable, then they have no claim to share in the upside either.

Jbub

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1849
  • Gender: Male
  • HP 9999
  • Respect: +584
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #110 on: October 17, 2022, 01:17:31 PM »
+1
No, that line actually appeared in printed testimony before the PEB (page 32).

https://www.trains.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PEB-Recommendation.pdf
That last line is total BS!

"The Carriers assert that since employees have been fairly and adequately paid for their efforts and do not share in the downside risks if the operations are less profitable, then they have no claim to share in the upside either."

Who gets laid off and looses their income during an economic downturn? An investor still has their stock even if the value has fallen, the only time they realize losses is if the sell at a low point. Even if they do, they will try some fancy accounting b.s. to write off those losses on their taxes.
"Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!"

Darth Vader

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13394
  • Respect: +3255
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #111 on: October 17, 2022, 02:50:20 PM »
+1
An investor still has their stock even if the value has fallen, the only time they realize losses is if the sell at a low point. Even if they do, they will try some fancy accounting b.s. to write off those losses on their taxes.

Not completely true .. I've had several companies that I owned stock in go bankrupt - none recently, but back during the computer revolution (Eagle Computer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_Computer ) .. the only thing I got was a letter that said my stock was worthless ...  You can deduct the stock loss in company that liquidates, but you have to have the documentation for the original purchase price .. just like any other loss  -I'm not an accountant or tax expert - but that was my experience

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #112 on: October 17, 2022, 05:23:05 PM »
+1
That last line is total BS!

"The Carriers assert that since employees have been fairly and adequately paid for their efforts and do not share in the downside risks if the operations are less profitable, then they have no claim to share in the upside either."

Who gets laid off and looses their income during an economic downturn? An investor still has their stock even if the value has fallen, the only time they realize losses is if the sell at a low point. Even if they do, they will try some fancy accounting b.s. to write off those losses on their taxes.

Yeah, no *****!

That's why, if I worked for a railroad, I'd be ready to burn the f***er down myself.

signalmaintainer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 421
  • Respect: +234
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #113 on: October 17, 2022, 06:21:17 PM »
0
Yeah, no *****!

That's why, if I worked for a railroad, I'd be ready to burn the f***er down myself.

That thought has crossed my mind. ... : :)
NSMR #1975, RMR #4

Lenny53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Respect: +1700
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #114 on: October 20, 2022, 08:39:40 AM »
+1

signalmaintainer

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 421
  • Respect: +234
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #115 on: October 26, 2022, 03:31:03 PM »
+2
The Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen has voted down the tentative agreement by a 60% to 40% tally. The BRS sent out about 6300 ballots, and about 4600 were returned.

We can strike on or after Nov. 19, same as BMWED.
NSMR #1975, RMR #4

Lenny53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Respect: +1700
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #116 on: October 26, 2022, 09:00:49 PM »
0
The Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen has voted down the tentative agreement by a 60% to 40% tally. The BRS sent out about 6300 ballots, and about 4600 were returned.

We can strike on or after Nov. 19, same as BMWED.

https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/signalmens-union-rejects-contract-agreement-with-u-s-class-i-railroads/

Lenny53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Respect: +1700
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #117 on: November 17, 2022, 02:40:33 PM »
0

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #118 on: November 17, 2022, 05:17:21 PM »
0
^ "Congress can also prevent or end a strike by extending a cooling-off period during which the unions cannot strike, or by imposing a contract on union members."

I get that they could impose a contract as a matter of law, but how would that actually compel or force anyone to do work if they go out on a strike in defiance of the (imposed) contract?   They could fire people I suppose (as Reagan did) but that would not get trains moving.

Pardon my ignorance, I'm just not clear on how it is supposed to work in that case (beyond everyone hoping that it never goes that far).

Ed

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3542
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Here we go, NS taking preemptive action
« Reply #119 on: November 17, 2022, 09:47:44 PM »
+2
Lack of sick leave ought to be illegal in 2022. Management has held all the cards and power for far too long and will not do right by their employees unless forced. Period. End of discussion.
Peter Pfotenhauer