0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't want to split hairs over the definition of "prototypical", but the doors on the Rapido car are much closer to center than on the NYC prototype. The Rapido car is correct in that it has end doors, but here is a photo of a NYC car of the 9100 series-Clearly, the door spacing is different. I would argue that the Walthers/Railsmith is closer, in terms of door spacing, although the larger door is too small.Sides for these cars are (were?) available from Laser Horizons. Years ago, I had a set that were one of my early failures in car building when whatever adhesive I used caused major distortions.Here, for reference, is the end door detail, courtesy of John Barriger collection:https://www.flickr.com/photos/barrigerlibrary/35034557622
I am going to resist the temptation to search through every copy of MR and RMC I have to see if I have something with the copy of the CGW car that the Walthers is based on.
Measuring both cars over the ends of the carbody, I get 5.29" for the Walthers car (just over 70' 6" in N scale), and 5.527" for the Rapido car (just over 73'8"). The CN diagrams show the car as 73'6 over end sills, and refer to it as a 73' car. The NYC diagrams show the 9100 series cars as 71' 1.125" over end "frames" (I assume the same as "sills") on diagrams on the Canada Southern site. So, the Walthers car is 7" short, the Rapido car about 30" too long. I am going to resist the temptation to search through every copy of MR and RMC I have to see if I have something with the copy of the CGW car that the Walthers is based on.NYC car shown below.
Here’s the missing ACL express reefer. Stock Micro-Trains scheme but roof modified (sanded the diagonal panels flat) to mimic the earlier cars. This works for the 1950-ish REA red/green/silver scheme too!
I know Tom, right? So many projects, so little time...Nice train, Mike! Is the Bachmann Hudson a good runner?Otto