0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I wonder if the problem is that the CAD drawing is made in a way that the axle point is riding in the center of the bearing cup, when in real life the axle has some play in it, so it rides a bit higher in the axle cup?
One would think that with the design being done in CAD, there should not be any clearance or interference issues between various parts of the car (like axle and the center frame). I wonder if the problem is that the CAD drawing is made in a way that the axle point is riding in the center of the bearing cup, when in real life the axle has some play in it, so it rides a bit higher in the axle cup? Just a theory.
If the shims add the clearance that was lost by the truck sitting lower on the axle cones than they were supposed to, that means the car once shimmed is back to where it should be height wise. In other words, out of the box it may be too low... will have to measure it out I guess.
True about the overall height from the railhead, but shimming will increase the distance between the bottom of the car and the top of the truck, and that is where the excessive ride height is most visible.
I suppose the proper place to shim then would be between the truck frame and the pickups, which will be tough to do as the pickups sit on pins inside the truck.
If the real problem is with the axle points riding too high in the cups the the easiest and best solution would be to slightly push the axle ends out, to increase the overall axle length, but just long enough to ride in closest to the center of the cups, while still free rolling.I still think that modifying (trimming) the center beam slightly is the simplest and easiest solution which does not change the ride height.
So two things there, pushing the axles out will change the gauge of the wheelset, and although I myself am leaning towards just filing the centersill as others have done to create added clearance, it doesn't fix the fact the carbody may still be too low.