Author Topic: More sluts  (Read 1681 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24769
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9286
    • Conrail 1285
More sluts
« on: April 28, 2021, 07:33:32 PM »
+1

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18401
  • Respect: +5672
Re: More sluts
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2021, 07:45:59 PM »
0
Looks a little bit too classy for sluts?

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3572
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1172
Re: More sluts
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2021, 07:46:11 PM »
0
The Railwire is not your personal army.  :trollface:

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11698
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6851
Re: More sluts
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2021, 08:07:48 PM »
+1
Looks a little bit too classy for sluts?

Well, “independent female escorts” was too long to fit on a single 50’ box car.  :D

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32993
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5350
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: More sluts
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2021, 08:17:27 PM »
0
I found it very amusing, but I suspect there is no hope for MTL producing that classy graffiti on one of their cars.  :D
. . . 42 . . .

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32993
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5350
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: More sluts
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2021, 08:19:13 PM »
0
Well, “independent female escorts” was too long to fit on a single 50’ box car.  :D

DFF

Not necessarily a female escort.  It could just be a promiscuous person with no money-for-service being exchanged.  ;)
. . . 42 . . .

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5386
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3609
Re: More sluts
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2021, 08:19:40 PM »
0
I found it very amusing, but I suspect there is no hope for MTL producing that classy graffiti on one of their cars.  :D

They'll change it to SLOTS  :facepalm:

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32993
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5350
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: More sluts
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2021, 08:21:21 PM »
0
They'll change it to SLOTS  :facepalm:

LOL, you might just have something there!
. . . 42 . . .

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11698
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6851
Re: More sluts
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2021, 09:07:46 PM »
+2
Hooker was taken.  :P



DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32993
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5350
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: More sluts
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2021, 09:33:28 PM »
0
But, OTOH Hooker tank cars have been produced by multiple model RR manufacturers. 
. . . 42 . . .

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18401
  • Respect: +5672
Re: More sluts
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2021, 09:42:59 PM »
+1

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3547
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +752
Re: More sluts
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2021, 10:09:17 PM »
0
They'll change it to SLOTS  :facepalm:

They really should not be promoting gambling.  :D
Peter Pfotenhauer

reinhardtjh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3006
  • Respect: +365
Re: More sluts
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2021, 10:27:43 PM »
0


That's so classy it could be a strip club sign here around Fort Worth.
John H. Reinhardt
PRRT&HS #8909
C&O HS #11530
N-Trak #7566

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2676
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +132
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: More sluts
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2021, 11:44:05 PM »
0

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32993
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5350
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: More sluts
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2021, 11:46:57 PM »
0
I wonder how many cans of spray paint must go into a full car side graffiti?
. . . 42 . . .