Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 65013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

samusi01

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 521
  • Respect: +582
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #345 on: October 03, 2022, 10:47:16 PM »
0
@mu26aeh

You could also consider Iowa Scaled Engineering 24' bins (matches the measurement off Google Earth), with their extension rings, and a scratch built base... slightly cheaper but not by much. 3d printed as well which may explain the price point. You could also poke around and see what @spookshow did for his similar bins.

Sam

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16124
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6467
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #346 on: October 03, 2022, 10:51:18 PM »
0
Meh.  Get a couple of scraps of 2" PVC pipe, scribe them in a lathe, and build up the structure with strip styrene.  It'll cost you about $12,  $25 if you detail it with brass ladders etc.
Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #347 on: October 03, 2022, 10:52:45 PM »
0
I never thought about the lathe approach.  My dad has one 🤔

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13387
  • Respect: +3246
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #348 on: October 04, 2022, 06:02:34 AM »
0
We might be able to modify these ..






I have it drawn up for 24x48




« Last Edit: October 04, 2022, 06:19:16 AM by John »

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16124
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6467
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #349 on: October 04, 2022, 09:28:03 AM »
0
I never thought about the lathe approach.  My dad has one 🤔

I was thinking it would be fairly easy to use a fine tooth razor saw to scribe the corrugation into it.  You'd just have to clamp it so you can hold the blade parallel to the tube and apply pressure evenly so the whole blade contacts it from top to bottom.  Should take about 20 seconds each.

If you get good at it, I'll take a few!

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #350 on: October 04, 2022, 02:14:12 PM »
0
@John , Using Google Earth, I get 30' diameter and 70' tall.  Got a minute ?  :D

spookshow

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1890
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1987
    • Model Railroading Projects & Resources
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #351 on: October 05, 2022, 06:38:14 AM »
+2
@mu26aeh
You could also poke around and see what @spookshow did for his similar bins.

PVC, Campbell's corrugated aluminum foil, and various bits of strip styrene -



The tops and bottoms are resin castings I made using a Rix top and an Imex bottom -



-Mark

P.S. My apologies if you can't see the pictures. My website is not https and some browsers don't like that.

Pomperaugrr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1454
  • Respect: +1199
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #352 on: October 05, 2022, 08:52:33 AM »
0
Spookshow, that is a very interesting solution!  They look great.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #353 on: October 09, 2022, 04:32:55 PM »
+2
In no obvious order, a lot of different avenues of work was done in the basement this weekend.  My dad does flooring installation and almost always has some extra material leftover, especially with laminate flooring to account for waste etc, or gets deals on the end of a run on a color he orders.  The carpet was a free remnant from Lowes after they couldn't find the item in their system, they said lucky day, it's yours.  About 25% of the basement now has something on the floor.



I pulled up all the tracks where I spliced the yard back together and spread some glue, put them back in place.  Also removed the crossover to the inner most track that I'm using for LPG transload.  The idea there is it's actually a fair distance behind Lincoln, so I'm going to make crews at least run all the way to the east end of the yard, and reverse back to swap cars out.



I relocated all the electronics into a castaway cabinet from my dad (he also does custom cabinetry, can't remember what was wrong with this one).  I need to get a CPU style fan for ventilation


Lastly, while cleaning off the car storage cabinet (large flat surface attracts various tools, cars, buildings, whatever you seem to be holding at one point or another) so I could attach some benchwork framing to the walls, I moved mocked up buildings to the back corner of the yard and an idea popped into my head.  I could reconfigure some of these outside mains to represent various sidings of the Lehigh facility on the east end of the yard.  Since most of this version of Lincoln yard is "close enough", I figure why can't Lehigh be close enough as well.  These buildings are just set there in "get out of the way " fashion, with no intention of actual placement.




« Last Edit: October 09, 2022, 09:24:17 PM by mu26aeh »

Specter3

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 866
  • Respect: +156
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #354 on: October 09, 2022, 09:17:39 PM »
+1
One of the great things about planning in 1:1 is when you see these opportunities that would not exist in any other form of planning. Not that it totally makes this the best way to do it, but it is one of the advantages.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #355 on: October 10, 2022, 07:48:30 PM »
+3
Little bit of ballasting today, a few ties every night :D



davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #356 on: October 10, 2022, 08:33:09 PM »
+1
Little bit of ballasting today, a few ties every night :D

This makes me laugh.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #357 on: October 10, 2022, 08:41:28 PM »
+1
Thats the goal @davefoxx

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #358 on: October 10, 2022, 08:42:24 PM »
0

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #359 on: October 17, 2022, 02:45:05 PM »
0
Even layouts go thru the aging process.  Getting older, turning grey