Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 65121 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #285 on: March 05, 2022, 07:48:13 PM »
+6
Busy day in the basement today !  Cousin stopped by this morning to rewire the lighting circuit and got all the lights wired up.  I spent the afternoon getting all the full tiles in place.  Just the border pieces left to finish up.



Another step closer !

PS: You may need sunglasses during operation sessions.  At least no one should complain about not reading the car numbers  :D

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #286 on: March 12, 2022, 12:50:50 PM »
0
I love when I find research material for the Hanover Sub.  Jacks Mountain Tunnel is not easily accessible, requiring a good hike from where you can park.  And it's all privately owned land around the tracks so unless you have owners permission you're trespassing to get there.


Something else I never knew until recently was the infamous " Door to Hell " .  The story here is many years ago, when the line was under Western Maryland , a property owner nailed a solid oak 6 panel door to a telephone pole along the tracks.  He would decorate the door with seasonal holiday decorations for the passing train crew.  When the property owner passed away, the door was no longer decorated but still remains.  Crews have since named it " The Door to Hell ".  Here's a picture of it taken in early 2022.



« Last Edit: March 12, 2022, 01:46:48 PM by mu26aeh »

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #287 on: March 12, 2022, 08:00:25 PM »
0
How has that door not rotted away in the decades since the WM was merged into CSXT?

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6729
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #288 on: March 12, 2022, 08:03:57 PM »
0
How has that door not rotted away in the decades since the WM was merged into CSXT?

DFF


It’s painted Oak.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #289 on: March 12, 2022, 08:09:34 PM »
0
I'm not exactly sure but apparently it's still in very good condition.  Plus, how about the nails not rusting/corroding out that are holding a solid oak door  :o

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1466
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1398
    • The Little Rock Line
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #290 on: March 12, 2022, 08:25:28 PM »
+2
Tis' protected by the eternal power of Hell.   :scared:

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #291 on: March 12, 2022, 08:31:14 PM »
0

It’s painted Oak.

“Nope, it’s oak.”

~Lt. Col. Henry Blake

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6729
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #292 on: March 12, 2022, 10:58:19 PM »
+1
“Nope, it’s oak.”

~Lt. Col. Henry Blake


4077th?
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


PiperguyUMD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 749
  • Respect: +1820
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #293 on: March 13, 2022, 04:46:44 PM »
+1
oh man that's some great footage! Made me realize I've missed the mark on a few things!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #294 on: April 17, 2022, 08:13:05 PM »
+1
2 more walls sections almost complete.  Have to fill in the top section.  Ran wire for outlets.  1 more section of wall to frame out. 





Getting closer, but not nearly fast enough for me ......

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #295 on: April 18, 2022, 02:22:48 PM »
+2
Don't forget those metal plates that get applied to the studs in front of the waste pipe, so you don't put a nail or screw into the plumbing during drywall installation.  You don't want to find out the hard way some day that you pierced the poop pipe.

https://www.lowes.com/pd/USP-5-in-x-2-in-16-Gauge-Galvanized-Protection-Plates/3374518

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #296 on: May 07, 2022, 09:56:19 PM »
+2
I promise one day soon, there will be construction photos of the railroad being posted.  But it's just more 1:1 remodel photos.  Got the front wall studded out, insulated, drywalled and first mud/tape coat on.  I have to cut a panel out where my geothermal lines come down the wall and out the wall.  I left this as an access in case anything ever needs serviced/replaced etc  :scared:



End wall same deal, but only a couple sheets hung.  Going to build a box or something to hang over the cleanout pipe



And finally the back wall, lower section studded and insulation hung.  Still need some studs and pipe protectors for the upper section, frame out the window area



mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #297 on: May 16, 2022, 05:47:23 PM »
+1
Hung final sheets of drywall this weekend.  Started thinking of ideas.  First was @wm3798 old Hagerstown yard going on this wall, and possibly lengenthing it by a few feet. 



Then while at work late last night, another idea came around.  Yard still goes on that wall, but instead of returning as Hagerstown from the past Windsor St, instead it moves a little further west and becomes the G&W YorkRail Lincoln yard 😳

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #298 on: May 16, 2022, 06:51:38 PM »
0
That seems like a good plan for that yard.  I look forward to operating on that yard once again in now its third home.  :D

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16126
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6468
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #299 on: May 19, 2022, 12:07:08 PM »
0
It's better suited to be Lincoln Yard, anyway.  Way too small to really represent Hagerstown.
Looking forward to bumping cars there again.
Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net