0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Sure there is.If you're going to blame "spikes" in the output of certain power packs for causing the decoders in your locos to fail, then provide some proof that the peak output of those power packs can exceed the limits established by NMRA specs. Likewise, provide some proof that the decoders can withstand the peak input voltage limits established by NMRA specs.Again, some analysis that has been presented here in another thread seems to show that the peak output of an MRC 1300 does not exceed the limits of the NMRA specs.Do you have proof to the contrary?If so, will you present it on this forum? Although the decoder failures may seem to coincide with the use of certain power packs, that doesn't establish which device may be at fault. You still appear not to be grasping the situation. It's not about the disclaimer itself.It's about the lack of any supporting information to back it up.
@rapidotrains can we at least get a hint if it is a steam or diesel locomotive?
Sure. At this point we have no N scale steam in development. We need to get our first North American HO steam to market first to make sure we know what we are doing. We've done British steam, but it's a different beast.-JasonP.S. The latest newsletter can be read here: https://conta.cc/2KyM5Bt It includes quite a lot of behind-the-scenes stuff.
@Point353 2 questions:1: Do you have a Home Built or MRC 1300 power pack?2: Do you have a Rapido Sound loco?If you have a Rapido loco that was fried by an MRC powerpack, then I suppose you have a right to complain, but Im pretty sure other mfgs have similar disclaimers within their documents.
Dude, you have asked that over and over again. Jason said he put the disclaimer out and fried decoder issues went down significantly. So, assuming he isn’t lying, he was correct from his business standpoint to issue the warning. No in depth electronic research necessary. Many fried decoders start coming in. Way more than normal. Ask people sending in some basic questions. Pattern arises. Decoders keep coming back, customer questions confirm pattern. Issue warning against pattern. Returns diminish significantly. Warning worked. No in depth electrical analysis needed. Why would you bother? Jason didn’t design decoder. Probably doesn’t have anyone on staff that is a electrical guru to that level. I guarantee he has passed the info he has back to ESU. They do have electrical gurus on staff. They probably have dissected a few dead decoders. So I imagine they probably have an idea what is happening. Since ESU has not said anything you are free to draw your own conclusions. But until you line up a statistically significant sample of power packs to test and confirm they are all working appropriately, just knock it off. Manufacturing tolerances are highly variable depending on the company. Just go read Amazon reviews on cheap electronic gear. Some item will have great reviews for a year. Then suddenly the reviews turn to crap and for a few months the item seems to be garbage. Then the tide turns and the quality picks back up and the reviews start looking positive again. You get bad batches of parts, a machine gets out of tolerance, a line worker mails it in, crap happens. My dad worked in manufacturing of computer components and told me the stories. It is not Jason’s job to know and distribute the “Why”. For all we know ESU has told him to issue the warning and to not say anything else. That is all you are going to get. Get over it. If you cant please go back to your own thread(which I did read all of) and continue your rant there.