Author Topic: Request for Joe at MT  (Read 3385 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5380
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3605
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2016, 03:59:18 PM »
0
My request is that you stop releasing items that take away from my IM SD40-2 budget  :facepalm:

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3541
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2016, 04:15:08 PM »
+1
I want my weathered cars as singles. Multiples each month are fine, but I don't want to buy a Pan Am car to get an Ichabod hopper I want.
Peter Pfotenhauer

johnb

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1739
  • Respect: +928
    • My blog
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2016, 04:39:54 PM »
0
I just want a Yosemite Valley boxcar

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32954
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5340
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2016, 04:46:55 PM »
0
What about molding the ladders in the same material as the foot stirrups?  The foot stirrups appear to be very fine and are molded in color.

IIRC, they already mold them out of Delrin, and they still look clunky.
. . . 42 . . .

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5380
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3605
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2016, 05:14:23 PM »
0
I want my weathered cars as singles. Multiples each month are fine, but I don't want to buy a Pan Am car to get an Ichabod hopper I want.

I'm sure you can spin them off here or on the bay.

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3567
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1166
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2016, 12:18:13 AM »
0
IIRC, they already mold them out of Delrin, and they still look clunky.

But separately applied parts need not be clunky, look at the offerings from Atlas (ps1 and older acf pd boxcar) or Trainworx. Im all for finer tooling but they can be separately applied and fine in n scale.
The Railwire is not your personal army.  :trollface:

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3541
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2016, 09:03:44 AM »
+1
I'm sure you can spin them off here or on the bay.

MY take is that just about everyone will be trying that.
Peter Pfotenhauer

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1480
  • Respect: +145
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2016, 12:17:12 PM »
0
MY take is that just about everyone will be trying that.

Buying a 3 pack to get one car is bad enough.   The fact that that the demand for the covered hopper will probably exceed the combined demand for the two other cars in the set only adds insult to injury.

Catt

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1721
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +28
    • Boylerwerx
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2016, 12:55:43 PM »
-2
Those "grabbags" would have made more sense if they had kept the cars in their correct era.The bags in my opinion were just a way to get rid of some excess stock.

Sometimes I get the feeling that MTL thinks their customer base is just plain stupid.
Johnathan (Catt) Edwards
Sole owner of the
Grande Valley Railway
100% Michigan made

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8841
  • Respect: +1221
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2016, 01:15:44 PM »
+3
Some people don't seem to understand exactly what a grab bag is.

Jason

coosvalley

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1405
  • Respect: +640
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2016, 01:17:32 PM »
0
A cash grab????? :trollface:

cjm413

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1480
  • Respect: +145
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2016, 01:25:09 PM »
0
Those "grabbags" would have made more sense if they had kept the cars in their correct era.The bags in my opinion were just a way to get rid of some excess stock.

Sometimes I get the feeling that MTL thinks their customer base is just plain stupid.

All of the weathered 3 packs come with the same cars:

https://www.micro-trains.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=2353

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11031
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +608
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #27 on: November 21, 2016, 11:38:06 AM »
0
FWIW, and honestly I don't think the grab bags are marketed to modelers like me, but I gotta point out that the N&W twin hopper in the "Eastern Grab Bag" is lettered for and N&W HL class hopper - this class disappeared from the rails in the mid 1950s. Also listed as a possible part of this grab bag is a Norfolk Southern hopper circa late 1980s or up.

https://www.micro-trains.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=2279

What was Tom asking about? :tommann: :trollface:

Mark



Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24744
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9269
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Request for Joe at MT
« Reply #28 on: November 21, 2016, 01:35:18 PM »
0
OR they could just tool a correct body for a 50' boxcar :facepalm:

These graffiti boxcars and the shortline series boxes have great schemes, but it's still just lipstick on a pig to me..If that Berlin Mills scheme was on a scale, not compressed, model, I would have bought every one I could find...And I know the real proto for those cars has never and probably won't be made....But, due to the ugliness of that boxcar body, I bought NONE...

Imagine if Atlas never re-tooled the GP7s to correct them compared to the old Kato made versions...

It's ok to re-tool these, it really is...and long overdue, IMHO....Let 'em know Joe!



Yes, absolutely! It kills me, I'm loving lots of the schemes, and they're rendered beautifully, but I have banished those cars from my fleet because they just look so "wrong" compared to other cars.