Author Topic: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0  (Read 2110 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18396
  • Respect: +5668
MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« on: April 09, 2016, 12:16:26 PM »
+1
It's Facebook, but you should be able to see:
https://www.facebook.com/ModelRectifierCorporation/photos/a.200857639946459.54823.124311577601066/1150941601604720
https://www.facebook.com/ModelRectifierCorporation/photos/a.200857639946459.54823.124311577601066/1150941601604720/?type=3&theater

You asked, we listened...

New Road Names
New Road Numbers
Road Name Specific Details
Axle Pin Pickups for Tender Wheels
Front and Back Magnetic Knuckle Couplers
Traction Tire Equipped
Extra Weight In Tender
LED Lighting w/wiring to tender
Improved Draw Bar
DC and Dual-Mode DCC & Sound

Coming Summer 2016
« Last Edit: April 09, 2016, 12:53:50 PM by GaryHinshaw »

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32958
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5343
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2016, 12:36:03 PM »
+1
Sounds promising!  Now what will I do with the half a dozen of the old ones I bought at a fire-sale price few years back? Hopefully MRC will be selling spare parts for the new models do do some creative retrofitting.
. . . 42 . . .

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18396
  • Respect: +5668
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2016, 01:05:38 PM »
+1
In the photo you can see the contact tab behind the tender sideframes. Makes me wonder why they didn't first do this with the 2-8-2's?

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11229
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9345
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2016, 01:33:00 PM »
+2
In my long range modeling plan is to bash one of these into a PRR D16sb.

Lemosteam

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5919
  • Gender: Male
  • PRR, The Standard Railroad of my World
  • Respect: +3668
    • Designer at Keystone Details
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2016, 02:58:12 PM »
+1
In my long range modeling plan is to bash one of these into a PRR D16sb.

After me of course... :trollface: :D

Oh @Ed Kapuscinski as we were recently discussing..... 8)


Cajonpassfan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5393
  • Respect: +1961
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2016, 03:01:11 PM »
0
Very cool! I would especially like to be able to purchase the all-wheel pickup tenders, w/DCC and sound, so I'd no longer have to graft LL tender shells onto Bachman slopeback frames and then stuff them full of electronics. More appropriate sideframes, too. Not too excited about the MRC decoders though...maybe they'll get it right this time?
Otto K.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2016, 03:03:16 PM by Cajonpassfan »

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24746
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2016, 04:50:01 PM »
0
In my long range modeling plan is to bash one of these into a PRR D16sb.

Heh, me too...

And that 2-6-0, well... this is awfully tempting to foob up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_National_89

jmlaboda

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2016, 12:35:20 AM »
0
So when are they going to offer a more modern Ten Wheeler similar to their 4-4-0 and 2-6-0?  Would be great if one of these were offered as well!!!

mmagliaro

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6368
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1871
    • Maxcow Online
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #8 on: April 10, 2016, 03:29:56 AM »
0
Nice..  Looks like they FINALLY get it. 

Archbar, all-wheel, axle-point-pickup tendert trucks!  Those would be perfect for my 0-6-0 project.  Unfortunately,
the Rules Committee (me), says I cannot use them; I have to make my own.

It also looks to me like that boiler shell is not made from the same hard-as-Kryptonite metal that the old MP shells were made of.
I would welcome that.  That metal was so hard it was just a nuisance to use for kitbashing.

Lemosteam

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5919
  • Gender: Male
  • PRR, The Standard Railroad of my World
  • Respect: +3668
    • Designer at Keystone Details
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2016, 09:02:19 AM »
0
Just got THIS from them on Facebook:

"Boiler is separate from the chassis. 

If you get the Undecorated version we give the following:

Two pilots
Two cylinder types
Two headlight positions
Two cabs
Two tender trucks"

Could they actually be catering to modelers?



Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11229
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9345
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #10 on: April 10, 2016, 09:18:44 AM »
0

Cajonpassfan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5393
  • Respect: +1961
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #11 on: April 10, 2016, 11:26:42 AM »
0
Oh boy oh boy oh boy!

http://s415.photobucket.com/user/eric220/media/prr1223sc.jpg.html


Dave, it didn't say it would come with two boilers :D
Seriously, this is great, undecs for me!
Otto K.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11229
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9345
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #12 on: April 10, 2016, 11:57:33 AM »
0

Dave, it didn't say it would come with two boilers :D
Seriously, this is great, undecs for me!
Otto K.

Ah, yes, but a little styrene goes a lot way toward a simple, short Belpaire firebox.

Lemosteam

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5919
  • Gender: Male
  • PRR, The Standard Railroad of my World
  • Respect: +3668
    • Designer at Keystone Details
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #13 on: April 10, 2016, 12:48:36 PM »
+1
@Dave Vollmer or a Keystone Details firebox to fit!
« Last Edit: April 10, 2016, 12:50:21 PM by Lemosteam »

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11229
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9345
Re: MP/MRC 4-4-0 and 2-6-0
« Reply #14 on: April 10, 2016, 12:55:32 PM »
+1
@Dave Vollmer or a Keystone Details firebox to fit!

I was expecting no less!