Author Topic: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report  (Read 152891 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24739
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9262
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #315 on: March 11, 2015, 11:51:59 PM »
0
Looks red to me (and colorized).

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18395
  • Respect: +5666
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #316 on: March 12, 2015, 12:04:34 AM »
0
Now you need some overland cars.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #317 on: March 12, 2015, 12:22:31 AM »
0
Now you need some overland cars.

Hells yeah.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #318 on: March 13, 2015, 10:36:12 PM »
0
Finished Hagerman trestle. All that remains to be added are the fire barrels.  The kitchen lighting makes the bridge look darker than it is.  In reality it's a little grayer.


basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3541
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #319 on: March 13, 2015, 11:01:56 PM »
0
Finished Hagerman trestle. All that remains to be added are the fire barrels.  The kitchen lighting makes the bridge look darker than it is.  In reality it's a little grayer.



A bridge to food.  :D
Peter Pfotenhauer

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6728
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #320 on: March 13, 2015, 11:10:47 PM »
0
It looks pretty level Dave.  How are you going to compensate for the 2% grade?
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18395
  • Respect: +5666
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #321 on: March 14, 2015, 12:10:23 AM »
0
By itself it looks 3 feet tall!

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #322 on: March 14, 2015, 12:12:54 AM »
0
It looks pretty level Dave.  How are you going to compensate for the 2% grade?

It's not...  It's the photo angle.  It's built so that when the bents are vertical, the deck is exactly at 2%

But, its European origins are obvious. The steps on my cabooses (way cars in Midland speak) don't clear the handrails on the barrel platforms...  :facepalm:

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18395
  • Respect: +5666
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #323 on: March 14, 2015, 12:24:33 AM »
0
ME flex bridge flex comes with barrel platforms. Their railings angle out.
http://images.toytrainheaven.com/www.toytrainheaven.com/255-80174S.jpg

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #324 on: March 14, 2015, 12:34:29 AM »
0
ME flex bridge flex comes with barrel platforms. Their railings angle out.
http://images.toytrainheaven.com/www.toytrainheaven.com/255-80174S.jpg

I know; I have them.  I was going to use them on the steel bridge, but it turns out the Midland didn't have fire barrels on their steel bridges.

S Class

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 300
  • Respect: +5
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #325 on: March 16, 2015, 11:28:03 AM »
0
Geeze you go away a while and suddenly Mr Vollmer is modelling the Rockies, what's next? DKS doing a room sized spaghetti bowl? Eric actually finishing a layout?  :trollface:
Regards
Tony A

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #326 on: March 16, 2015, 01:35:22 PM »
0
Actually this is a returning to roots... 

My first "serious" modeling effort in high school was HOn3 Rio Grande Southern.  We rode the D&SNG in 1989 and the bug bit hard.  The more I read about the narrow gauge, the more I kept reading about this goofy standard gauge railroad called the Colorado Midland, which acted in every way like a narrow gauge and disappeared just after World War I.  By the late 90s, I was freelancing in HO standard gauge a made-up line which connected with the Midland at Aspen and ran over Taylor Pass into Gunnison.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #327 on: March 17, 2015, 03:32:07 PM »
0
Assuming I scratchbuild an N scale version of the Grandt Line East Terrible stamp mill (and combine it with my Micro Engineering Poor Boy Mine), that still leaves me short two mine structures.

I've already decided that I have a Monroe Models building that will become the Aspen Sampling Works (a much smaller version than the real deal) but then on eBay I saw this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/N-Scale-Mine-Head-Scratch-Built-/231505682004?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item35e6d05e54

Looks to be a kitbash between a pair of coal tipples and some sort of warehouse structure.  I was thinking about how I could reporduce it, but for 10 bucks and stupid cheap shipping I could clean this one up and add some details.  The first thing it needs is a headframe, but many Colorado mines actually had enclosed headframes (a nice contrast to the exposed headrame for the Poor Boy).  I could easily scratchbuild an enclosed headframe for the rear of this structure.

First step is to ditch the green, change to oxide red or brown, and add a contrasting window color.  It will need an ore chute.

One thing to note...  Unlike coal mines back east at which coal is flooded into the top of an open car, the ore coming form Western hardrock mines was typically much more valuable (and prone to theft) so it was often poured in the side of an open boxcar door, spread to the ends to put the weight over the trucks, and locked.  Boxcars for ore service on the narrow gauge often had a pair of 2x12s nailed in the doorways to keep the ore inside (not unlike boxcars consigned to bulk grain service).  The other option was for the higher grade ore concentrates (such as those coming from a stamp mill) to be loaded in sacks into boxcars.  I want to represent both methods here.

Thoughts?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2015, 04:13:32 PM by Dave Vollmer »

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18395
  • Respect: +5666
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #328 on: March 17, 2015, 08:43:37 PM »
0
For $10 you can't go wrong.

What Monroe kit?

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11224
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9336
Re: Colorado Midland Railway Engineering Report
« Reply #329 on: March 17, 2015, 08:55:38 PM »
0
Oops...  My bad...  Motrak Models.

http://www.modeltrainstuff.com/MOT-N-Danielson-Building-Structure-Kit-p/mot-13000.htm

That, plus a re-roofed Walthers "Co-op storage shed" could be large enough to represent a sampling works...where smaller mine operators would bring samples of their ores for assay and quality control.