Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision  (Read 143295 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3542
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #150 on: December 27, 2015, 12:39:34 AM »
0
Hopefully sometime this week I plan on getting the airbrush out and dirtying up the yard.  Just too clean.  Still need 4 #8 Peco turnouts to finish the other end of yard, then I can finish ballast work in yard.

My paper mill has that same corky look to it in many spots right now. Are you going to try Ed's grout technique?
Peter Pfotenhauer

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #151 on: December 27, 2015, 06:06:05 PM »
0
My paper mill has that same corky look to it in many spots right now. Are you going to try Ed's grout technique?

At this time no, as at some point (maybe) the layout could move to where my garage is now.  In that case, benchwork and track work could change so I like the ability of the WS ballast to be able to be re-moistened and can pull the track up.  Most of grout I've seen, once it's wet, it's set .

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #152 on: December 27, 2015, 06:11:01 PM »
+1
Even with the extended holiday weekend for most, railroad crews in Hagerstown Yard are always busy .  They took in CR SW1500 #9594 to the shops for a check up after coming over in the acquisition, and also switched the unit over to the CSX numbering system.  Goes in as CR #9594, comes out as CSX #1072.

Prototype photo
http://www.trainweb.org/csxphotos/photos/SW1500/1072cr.jpg

20151227_173214 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

20151227_173259 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

I tried to decal the new numberboards, but I didn't have a decal set that had small enough numbers.  Ones I used ended up folded on itself and looked bad.  So I just painted them white for now until I try again at some point.  I will also at some point have to change out the handrails, as this unit had hood mounted version.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2015, 06:15:43 PM by mu26aeh »

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #153 on: December 28, 2015, 08:29:50 AM »
0
My heart breaks. But it looks good.

jpec

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 855
  • Gender: Male
  • Perception and reality engage in a daily civil war
  • Respect: +172
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #154 on: December 28, 2015, 09:57:11 PM »
0
Ever try the John Sing method of doing numberboards using Excel and mailing labels? I did it using regular paper and placing clear scotch tape on both sides of the paper before cutting it out and holding it in place with a dab of the Micro Scale stuff people use to make windows. I use the laser printer at the library to do it and I've gone as low as a 3 point type and they're still sharp.

Jeff
"trees are non-judgmental, and they won't abuse or betray you."- DKS

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #155 on: December 28, 2015, 10:15:25 PM »
0
"I sat too close to Ed and now I've got Conrail all over me..."

HA !!!!  I love it .

As I was reading your post, as soon as I read John Sing I remembered this technique.  I will have to try that and report back.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3542
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #156 on: December 29, 2015, 12:21:34 AM »
0
"I sat too close to Ed and now I've got Conrail all over me..."

HA !!!!  I love it .

As I was reading your post, as soon as I read John Sing I remembered this technique.  I will have to try that and report back.

We both have layouts in need of multi handed work sessions.

I ate lunch with Ed once. No Conrail on me afterwards thank goodness because on the Idaho Belt, there is no Conrail.
Peter Pfotenhauer

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8910
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #157 on: December 29, 2015, 08:30:54 AM »
0
but if given enough notice, there could be KCS . . . .
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #158 on: January 01, 2016, 12:55:13 PM »
0
First up, I found this site today while trying to figure out how I'm going to model the Butler Rd overpass at Glyndon/Emory Grove, MMID/CSX interchange.  Some good pictures of the bridge in question, as well as the old station.

http://www.railfanguides.us/baltimore/map2/index.htm

Also, on the other end of the layout.  I'm debating on how to block the entrance to west staging thru the scenic divider.

20151231_203243 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

On the prototype, on the very far western side of Hagerstown is Rt 81 so I could use a highway bridge.  Other option is having the area heavily forested and the trains entering under a canopy of trees.  I did a quick mock up but obviously this isn't enough to make a strong statement for this option.

20151231_203609 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8910
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #159 on: January 01, 2016, 01:38:20 PM »
0
I almost always find vegetation with an open cut much more convincing. Overpasses creat lines, especially with your coved corner. And those lines invite scrutiny instead of deflecting it.
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #160 on: January 01, 2016, 05:19:15 PM »
0
Phil makes a good point, but if you want to do an interstate overpass, I'd say go big like the one I did.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #161 on: January 01, 2016, 08:01:34 PM »
0
I'm not sure I could go big at that location.  There is only about 12-14" between divider and switch into yard.  I whipped this up this evening

20160101_194655 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8910
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #162 on: January 01, 2016, 09:11:34 PM »
0
Much improved imho. Heck you could even slap some of that Chooch timber cribbing on the one to the right and have some sort of . . . something over there.
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #163 on: January 01, 2016, 09:22:30 PM »
0
That straight vertical cutoff where I'm guessing you're talking about the cribbing is there just because that was the size of the foam board.  I'll shape out the rest of the hillside with a couple more pieces.

One other thing in this area is the yard backs up to the rear of a residential neighborhood with a line of trees, so I need some backdrop ideas of how to do that.

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #164 on: January 01, 2016, 09:34:20 PM »
0
As @Philip H suggested, avoid anything that emphasizes the curved backdrop.  Also, I say avoid any detail in this area that would draw the eye into it.  It's better to draw the eye away from this area.  So, just use foliage.  Lots and lots of foliage.  And, don't be afraid to use taller trees.  Ask @Ed Kapuscinski; he knows what I'm talking about.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!