0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Maybe make the corner closes to the camera a cutting but putting in another hill on the close side of the curve.
Looks like you shape the foam before gluing it down. If you glue down bigger, fuller chunks and then start removing maybe you'll get closer to what you want? Or you can just glue on more foam to what you have and blend it with sculptamold Heck you could even make a stone bridge out of the stuff!
Couldn't the lane to the cattle pens have a house or a small pub or some hint of a town along it?
I'd have the road to the "cattle dock" come in from the bottom of version #2.
My ideaPut a guard rail at the sharp bend or a short rock wall.And now I wanna build another
I'm trying to avoid a lane that is specifically for the cattle dock as it, at least to my eyes, makes the layout more "busy" and I'm going for a more relaxed look.
(Come to think of it, I really should come up with a name for the layout/railway...)
Move the cattle dock into the middle of the siding and main line, remove the small hill or carve it out to fit, the laneway serving the cattle dock crosses the railway at grade heading straight down the photo and is independent of the 'road'. Two bits of sleeper between the line for the crossing and a cattle guard and she's done.The road can go on the other side of the hill and cross the line however but goes off scene following the creek as the original roman/celtic path probably would have. both scenes are now independent of each other but keeps the layout from being cluttered while still interestingPity you're not doing Wales, just mash the keyboard and whatever comes out would be suitably gaelic.guywiuujhniiuhrbwojunirbeiulyyyynSee?
I like Cody's Version 2--it has a natural feel to it. If there's a tall, thick strip of trees between the road and the cattle dock lane, it will help visually expand the layout and reduce the visual clutter. Ironically, I'm not too keen on Chris' overpass suggestion. Ordinarily I would endorse an overpass to break up the loop, but I think the vertical features required to support it would be awkward-looking and create the kind of visual clutter you're trying to avoid. IMO, FWIW, etc.
Edit: In looking at the plans again, I really think version 2 will wind up looking the least cluttered and most rural. It allows the dividing hill to exist unbroken for most of the length I the layout. The others break up the natural barrier and seem to emphasize the road as a featured part of the layout.