0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If the metal weight is a contributing factor to the out-of-scale proportions of the seats... then perhaps the manufactures need to get rid of the weights. Besides, excess weight means that you can't pull proto-length trains with a proto-consist.
Manufacturers are well within the capability to produce cheap passenger cars with acceptable representation of figures included by default, whether molded in or otherwise.
Almost all the seats on N car interiors are double seats. If you want to stick one person sitting there, yeah, you'll have to chop off everything just below the belt (because the interior floor is several feet higher than the prototype) but you can get him/her in there. However, two people sitting in a seat are close together, so if you want to put a couple in one seat you have to also chop off matching parts of their sides (including arms) to get two typical single figures into one seat. (How do I know this? Don't ask). And yes, interiors are not accurate. The dome decks on the Kato COLA are compressed and flattened: the aisle down the middle should be 2 feet wide but is only 1, the chair backs barely stick up above the cast floor. The seats themselves are also too narrow, because this deck has to fit under the dome side edges of thick plastic and on top of the car shell roof of thick plastic, etc. Because N car floors, walls, ends, roof, bulkheads, etc are way way scale thicker than the real cars, the interior by necessity has to be shrunk to fit. Plus figure in the window glass thickness, any lighting bar that might be added, whatever, and its easy to see why N scale figures do not fit inside N scale passenger cars. However, you can modify the Kato dome decks to ride lower (sitting on the light bar) and widen the seat backs enough that putting people in them looks pretty good.That said, I can see why the plastic for an interior floor would have to be thick, but why the interior partitions for sleeper compartments, dining areas, etc? They really don't need to be because they are only cosmetic and form no structural part holding the car together. Certainly thinner interior walls would also mean less plastic used per interior cast, thus making some economic sense for the maker. And I agree that figures in N cars are hard to see, especially when the train is moving, but empty car after empty car is very noticeable. Maybe representation of "somethings" added to the car interiors, of colors different from the interior - enough to give the impression that people are in the passing car -- could be done by using different bits of colored modeling clay: make a torso out of one color, stick a small colored bead on for a head -- add a piece of bent plastic stock maybe as a raised arm -- and put it away from the windows, or behind a shade in a lighted sleeper. Add a few Preiser figures placed here and there where they can be clearly seen, and that may do the trick without too much expense or fussing about detail. Sort of like when you make a forest backdrop: put some super-detailed trees up front, switch to foam clumps behind them, and cutouts of furnace filter material way in the back.
All you said is true, but you never indicated if your preference is to, or not to include factory installed/molded figures in passenger cars.