Author Topic: Trainfest 2010 Report  (Read 10530 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24923
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9571
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2010, 04:53:08 PM »
0
But they're only $7. That's HALF the price of the IM cars. For that, you can put the $3 after market parts on them and STILL come out well ahead.

I like em, for just that reason.

mcjaco

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1724
  • Respect: +121
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2010, 04:55:38 PM »
0
Not all units had them installed, so I presume they are separate parts.  Lots of railroads had them?

Hopefully they'll be available as a seperate part too.  But it is Bachmann....  ::)

~ Matt

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16233
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6674
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2010, 05:16:14 PM »
0
On the Bachmann Stuff...
The Peter Witt car is hot as a firecracker...  One has to wonder how it will run, though.
The 10-wheeler is also sexy... Does the behemoth tender conceal a motor?  Or can we swap in something more appropriately sized?
The GP looks very promising, provided the drive isn't made of Limburger cheese, and the couplers aren't installed with an air hammer.  WM had winterization hatches on all of its Geeps, a detail which thus far has evaded my work bench...

Did the re-release of the Walther's GP20 really have factory installed grabs?  Or was that for an HO display below the N case?

Nice report, I appreciate the effort you put in to keeping us up to date.
Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mcjaco

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1724
  • Respect: +121
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2010, 05:17:35 PM »
0
Lee, the tender on the 10 wheeler is there normal short tender.  No motor in there.
~ Matt

Roger Holmes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1240
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +623
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2010, 05:20:09 PM »
0
Lee--I agree on the Peter Witt car.  I held it for a close-up look and it is really nice!

Also, the tender on the 4-6-0 looks more in proportion in person than in photos.  I'd seen photos before Trainfest and expected it to look worse than it did.

I think the aerial photo of Mini ModuTrak was taken standing on the concession stand trash receptacle--just a thought although that's the concession stand where all the security seemed to be hanging out.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2010, 05:29:24 PM by Roger Holmes »
Best regards,

Roger

There are 10 kinds of people in the world.  Those who understand the binary system and those who don't.

Denver Road Doug

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2120
  • Respect: +28
    • Mockingbird Industrial
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2010, 05:30:03 PM »
0
But they're only $7. That's HALF the price of the IM cars. For that, you can put the $3 after market parts on them and STILL come out well ahead.

Until you consider the $4 Micro-Trains trucks/couplers.
NOTE: I'm no longer active on this forum.   If you need to contact me, use the e-mail address (or visit the website link) attached to this username.  Thanks.

lashedup

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +108
    • Model 160
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2010, 06:30:05 PM »
0
Jamie,
While looking at your gallery, I noticed an apparently fully scenicked 'Franksville' on the Modutrak set-up.
Any chance there would be other photographs of this module in 'finished' state ?

Marc

It isn't actually done. I have five buildings nearly done and some basic scenery. I needed to cover the module in something for the NTS this past summer. I'll take some photos and post up. I'm trying to get it wrapped up by March.

lashedup

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +108
    • Model 160
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2010, 06:32:00 PM »
0


How did I miss this, and what the heck did you climb?


Fully extended tri-pod that I held over my head with a timer to trip the shutter. Throw in the wide angle and it looks higher than it is.

93cram

  • Guest
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2010, 06:52:40 PM »
0
It isn't actually done. I have five buildings nearly done and some basic scenery. I needed to cover the module in something for the NTS this past summer. I'll take some photos and post up. I'm trying to get it wrapped up by March.

Understand, yet it looks cool at a distance !  ;D
Looking forward to see that beauty again  8)
Believe it or not, the thread about Franksville solved two issues I've procrastinated upon for way too long :
- benchwork style
- double or single track

Marc

sirenwerks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5870
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +396
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #24 on: November 15, 2010, 08:07:22 PM »
0
What I wouldn't do if Bachmann would retool its PCC to the same sexiness as the Peter Witt. The GP7s do look promising and, like Ed, I wonder what the deal is with the weather hatches.

What's up with the Deluxe Innovation Armco 'station'? It kinda looks like two Armcos stuck together or that kit has a really poorly engineer joint in the middle. Is it two? And where's the prototype pic from?
Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.

lashedup

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +108
    • Model 160
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #25 on: November 15, 2010, 08:13:53 PM »
0
I believe it is a UP prototype. That was just a mockup of what the kit will look like. You are correct that they just used two existing structure kits and bashed them together.

sirenwerks

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5870
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +396
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #26 on: November 15, 2010, 08:31:11 PM »
0
I believe it is a UP prototype. That was just a mockup of what the kit will look like. You are correct that they just used two existing structure kits and bashed them together.

Hmmm, aside from the bad joint and the lack of distance between the roll-ups, it looks promising. I've been seeing a number of these types of replacement stations in Morning Sun books lately.
Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8941
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4962
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #27 on: November 15, 2010, 08:41:23 PM »
0
The Atlas GPs work fine for me.  I don't see the logic in Bachmann tooling up a GP7.  And, wouldn't the Atlas SD50 winterization hatches work on the Atlas GP7?
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net


wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16233
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6674
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #28 on: November 15, 2010, 08:47:56 PM »
0
Honestly, the new Bmann Geep could spell the end of the ages old Crapmaster F? that's been going into their train sets since God was a boy.  I think the vacuum that was created in N scale when Walther's moved the team to Indianapolis (2 points for the obscure reference) is going to be filled by reasonably priced, reasonable quality locomotives from Bachmann.

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mplsjct

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 504
  • Respect: +436
Re: Trainfest 2010 Report
« Reply #29 on: November 15, 2010, 09:15:16 PM »
0
I believe the winterization hatches on an SD50 would be too wide for the GP7.

Thanks for the update, for the most part, all three major shows had little new product announced for N scale, but, I am most pleased by the FVM announcement of Milw cabs.
I’m not here to argue