0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
What the Bryans said............ and a +60s carbon black car.And if you're feeling frisky- a green and white Cab O Sil car would be nice. I can send you as many pics as you want, in multiple variations of green.Bruce
Bruce,Are you talking about the Dry-Flo 3500 cf covered hoppers? That would be a great car for MT to do! Especially in CGW (and Cab-O-Sil).Bryan B.
The GATC DRy-Flo and Dia-Flo weren't carbon black cars
No one was calling them carbon black cars. I sure as heck wasn't.
Not on purpose, no... Bruce asked for a carbon black car, then referenced Cab-O-Sil, which is the trade name for a fumed silicate, which is hauled in the same design cars that carbon black is.
But my previous reference to the GATC Dry-Flo trumps your assumption. And even so, roads hauled carbon black in non-carbon black cars - CGW used single bay Airslides. Continuing the logic, the GATC 3600 being the predecessor technology to the Airslide, one could reasonably assume that a railroad, had it wanted to, could have moved carbon black in the larger capacity earlier cars. Hence, your complaint is moot and my statement was sound. ;DNext please...
I like the slab-side covered hopper idea as well. I also like the idea of a 1960s era medium-to-large capacity tank car and a 1960s era carbon black covered hopper.BTW, whatever happened to the end-brakewheel SP flat you were considering. We still need finely detailed end brakewheel flats.
Quote from: Bruce Bird on November 03, 2010, 09:44:23 PMWhat the Bryans said............ and a +60s carbon black car.And if you're feeling frisky- a green and white Cab O Sil car would be nice. I can send you as many pics as you want, in multiple variations of green.BruceBruce,Are you talking about the Dry-Flo 3500 cf covered hoppers? That would be a great car for MT to do! Especially in CGW (and Cab-O-Sil).Bryan B.
I think Joe stopped listening.