Author Topic: Con Cor 89' flats  (Read 3013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2676
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +132
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: Con Cor 89' flats
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2010, 01:55:29 PM »
0
Aren't TTGX and ETTX both autorack reporting marks?


Jason

TTX has reassigned marks once and a while over the years, but I don't think those two have ever been used prior to the current enclosed autoracks.

So to answer your question, yes.

(Also, those containers look like crap, and the container bolsters especially look like crap)

jsoflo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 218
  • Respect: +23
Re: Con Cor 89' flats
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2010, 08:50:00 PM »
0
Much thanks Roger! I am converting my entire set of modules to a Northeastern winter between Philadelphia and Binghamton.
my best,
Jan

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: Con Cor 89' flats
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2010, 09:07:26 PM »
0
If this state of the art tooling is a foreshadow of things to come, the 90's are going to be a great decade for n scale.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9338
Re: Con Cor 89' flats
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2010, 09:14:27 PM »
0
If this state of the art tooling is a foreshadow of things to come, the 90's are going to be a great decade for n scale.

FTW.