Author Topic: Is it time for new/updated rolling stock weight 'standards'?  (Read 3658 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11026
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +602
Re: Is it time for new/updated rolling stock weight 'standards'?
« Reply #15 on: May 02, 2010, 10:51:03 AM »
0
Some other standards I would like to see:
Standardized coupler pockets (we almost have that with the 1015, but I would like to see an underslug standard).


Kato kinda screwed this up, as they used to use a 1015 compatible pocket. >:(


Rossford Yard

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1172
  • Respect: +145
Re: Is it time for new/updated rolling stock weight 'standards'?
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2010, 01:23:40 PM »
0
I agree that in theory, the standard could come down just a little, but I don't find cars weighted to NMRA standards to feel heavy to the hand.  The one variable that keeps the need for less weight down is track quality, which no one but the modeler can control, with excellent track product choices, great track laying, and a decent choice of layout venue, i.e., not the garage.

I just weighted all my cars to NMRA standards, and find they run and really push back in switching, much, much better than they used to.  I also do notice when I push a standard length train by hand that the extra .1oz per car I might have added does feel much heavier.  So, loco pull is an issue, but I never eally mind adding a unit! :D

I believe consistent weight per inch is the key to good running, so the standards could be changed a little, but I wonder if in the practical world it would be more than 1/100th of an oz per inch?  So, I would leave them as is, and if modelers just made their choices based on their own track, layout locale, etc., to make their own standards (as most now do anyway) then there is no real harm done.  But, there is no harm done leaving them as is, so those who are members of clubs that use the standard don't have to make big changes.

billincarmel

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: 0
Re: Is it time for new/updated rolling stock weight 'standards'?
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2010, 01:53:59 PM »
0
I like usable standards and wish the manufacturers would comply. For myself right now, I add weight to any car that has trouble tracking and going through turnouts. All the others I leave alone.
The Totally Inferior Modeler

Kev1340

  • Guest
Re: Is it time for new/updated rolling stock weight 'standards'?
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2010, 03:12:08 AM »
0
I don't have tight radii, but do have some healthy gradients, so I weight my cars according to how they operate on my layout, rather than the NMRA standards.

I have generally found that with Athearn I reduce the weight by about 1/3. They are by far the heaviest RTR cars I've encountered, made worse by the poor running trucks they have generally used. The newer trucks they've used of late do seem to be a little better.

Cheers,

Kev