Author Topic: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight  (Read 5890 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +25
Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« on: June 11, 2009, 11:09:26 PM »
0
Did anybody see the new issue of N Railroading yet? In the N Horizons section they had a blurb that said the first MTL Heavyweight would be the RPO based on a GN car with copies built by PS and ACF. Should be out in October according to Kirk Reddie. I thought they were going to introduce four cars at once, but an RPO would be very good.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11043
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +609
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2009, 09:34:42 AM »
0
Man I hope these are good. Especially on the ride height. I hope they don't tool up 36" pizza cutters.


Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4974
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1532
    • Modutrak
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2009, 10:02:49 AM »
0
Man I hope these are good. Especially on the ride height. I hope they don't tool up 36" pizza cutters.

Ditto.  But, what are the chances?  So many prototype drawings exist at the Pullman Library and elsewhere.  They have the Branchline HO cars, which were painstakingly researched, to copy.

But, it'll probably end up like the SP caboose and be based off some error filled published drawing in a magazine.  My guess would be some Harold Geissel drawing from an old RMC. 

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +25
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2009, 10:21:28 AM »
0
I don;t know about their dimensioning situation, but since most N scale models seem to have some kingd of ride height issues with somebody, I would have to say this will also.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11043
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +609
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2009, 10:54:36 AM »
0
I don;t know about their dimensioning situation, but since most N scale models seem to have some kingd of ride height issues with somebody, I would have to say this will also.

All the passenger cars I own from quite a large selection of makers are pretty close in height (within reason).


Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +245
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2009, 11:05:40 AM »
0
Of course it will be wrong - everything in n scale is always wrong....right ? ;D

The RPO is an interesting choice for the first car to be released; I'd have thought a passenger revenue car would be more popular but perhaps not....
« Last Edit: June 12, 2009, 11:12:01 AM by Puddington »
Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +25
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2009, 11:12:18 AM »
0
RPO's and Baggage cars could run the gamut of era's as most railroads didn't phase them out with Streamlined cars. Many rarilroads never bought streamlined headend cars at all. So I think this or a baggage car isn't such a bad first choice. C&O or L&N would make me a very happy camper.

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11043
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +609
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2009, 11:16:01 AM »
0
How not to do it:



 ;D


Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +245
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2009, 11:55:36 AM »
0
RPO's and Baggage cars could run the gamut of era's as most railroads didn't phase them out with Streamlined cars. Many rarilroads never bought streamlined headend cars at all. So I think this or a baggage car isn't such a bad first choice. C&O or L&N would make me a very happy camper.

I agree, but I'd have preferred a full baggage; but, it's a HW so I'll be looking forward to seeing what they deliver !
Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!

Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +245
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2009, 11:56:16 AM »
0
How not to do it:



 ;D

"Selective Compression" taken too far ?  ;D
Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4974
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1532
    • Modutrak
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2009, 12:00:26 PM »
0
How not to do it:



 ;D

Haha, at least it will look right next to your SP cabooses...

FrankCampagna

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 999
  • Respect: 0
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2009, 06:04:01 PM »
0
Will the care be a full RPO, or the more common baggage/RPO combo?

Frank
"Once I built a railroad, made it run......."

jmlaboda

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2009, 01:07:19 AM »
0
"The RPO is an interesting choice for the first car to be released; I'd have thought a passenger revenue car would be more popular but perhaps not...."

The down side is that the mail car will be based on the USRA design, which is not all that common.  Only around six lines or so (based on actual RR diagrams) were owners of this type of car, though if a baggage car is eventually done it is possible that the RPO can be kitbashed into a couple of baggage - mail.

Here's a prototype shot of what MT is doing... not at all a common prototype.
http://www.gnflyer.com/OLorigPics/newpassengerCap.jpg

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +25
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2009, 01:22:44 AM »
0
You're not going to get EVERY different correct version of an RPO done for all the roads. Nor are you going to expect that many roads won't get done JUST because it's not 90% accurate. My guess would be yeah there will be some that are pretty close and then some that are straight out foobies but they can sell them anyway.

Puddington

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3874
  • Gender: Male
  • Modelling is the best medicine for what ails me.
  • Respect: +245
    • The Canadian Pacific Railway's Dominion
Re: Upcoming MTL Heavyweight
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2009, 01:24:08 AM »
0
"The RPO is an interesting choice for the first car to be released; I'd have thought a passenger revenue car would be more popular but perhaps not...."

The down side is that the mail car will be based on the USRA design, which is not all that common.  Only around six lines or so (based on actual RR diagrams) were owners of this type of car, though if a baggage car is eventually done it is possible that the RPO can be kitbashed into a couple of baggage - mail.

Here's a prototype shot of what MT is doing... not at all a common prototype.
http://www.gnflyer.com/OLorigPics/newpassengerCap.jpg

Ok; so now I am really confused......I have to believe that there are more common RPO's; nevermind baggage/express cars...
Model railroading isn't saving my life, but it's providing me moments of joy not normally associated with my current situation..... Train are good!