0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No argument about the sharpness of the alps; however, the fuzziness of a good laserjet image is only visible under high magnification. As for rendering fonts, at 3 points the alps starts to fall apart, and at 2 points it fails completely. And of course the alps can do nothing with a grayscale except print halftone dots which are easily seen with the naked eye.Some dimi data is in the 3 and 2 point range; most of the lettering for the DB4 containers is 2 points, and looks awful (unfortunately, there's no choice but to use the alps since it must be white).And the school bus decals would suffer on the alps given some text is 2 points, and the colored areas would be dithered (unless one goes to the trouble of obtaining the required spot colors). Under normal viewing, and indeed even under macro photography, the laserjet image looks good and crisp, with no objectionable fuzziness. (White specs are reflections, not flaws.)If it were me, I'd have experimented with finding ways to reliably register an inkjet image over an alps white background print for the graf decals, because the inkjet would have rendered the color image without visible halftoning. That would look seriously impressive, IMO.
Interesting. I wonder if my alps has shat the couch. All of the settings are correct.
Thanks for that, Peteski. I did do the test prints I posted on top-grade HP photo film, not plain paper or decal paper, on both printers for a fair comparison. I hear you on the black magic part--as it is, I recall that it took me weeks of spare time just to get the printer to listen to a PC (I tried three of them); I don't even remember exactly what what I did that finally got its attention, but it wasn't straightforward by any means.