Author Topic: The BNSF Red River Valley Sub  (Read 5442 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rivet Miscounter

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 792
  • Respect: +404
Re: The BNSF Red River Valley Sub
« Reply #30 on: November 03, 2020, 10:15:21 PM »
0
This is Acme, to the west of Quanah.  Once a community but now simply the location of the Georgia Pacific gypsum quarry/plant.   A nice size industry worthy as a focal point of a layout.   Also adjacent to South Groesbeck Creek which provides some scenic flair with the arroyo-esque creek passing under both BNSF mainlines, one still with bridge girders labeled for the Quanah, Acme, & Pacific Railway...a popular spot for railfan photos.   The second main (closest to the GP plant) was originally the QA&P/Frisco mainline that crossed the FW&D at Acme on the way west to Floydada and points west.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

KEY:
Orange = mainlines (South)East - (North)West ex-BN/FW&D and North branch main to Altus
Red = Remaining branch/industry trackage
« Last Edit: November 03, 2020, 11:24:15 PM by Rivet Miscounter »
Doug

MDW

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 184
  • Respect: +102
Re: The BNSF Red River Valley Sub
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2020, 08:37:06 AM »
0
Doug-
If you are going for a modest start then Quanah is the perfect location-compact, picturesque, with some operating potential.  It’s also makes sense for future expansion - you can build west if you want more open, mainline running or east to take on the challenge of modeling Wichita Falls.  Either way is a win!

Michel

coldriver

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 327
  • Respect: +584
Re: The BNSF Red River Valley Sub
« Reply #32 on: November 07, 2020, 07:36:33 AM »
+2
hey Doug, I think Quanah should make for a fine layout theme, especially by beefing it up a bit in terms of making active the inactive industries in the area.  One recent development you're not likely aware of is an intermodal ramp to be constructed at Altus, OK on the branch for loading double stacked cottonseed trains!  Not sure if you saw that Virtual Railfan put in a Quanah cam a few weeks ago.  It subsequently crashed but I understand they're working on getting it back up and running

Rivet Miscounter

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 792
  • Respect: +404
Re: The BNSF Red River Valley Sub
« Reply #33 on: November 13, 2020, 05:14:37 PM »
0
hey Doug, I think Quanah should make for a fine layout theme, especially by beefing it up a bit in terms of making active the inactive industries in the area.

I really don't want to embellish too much or step too far outside of the 2005 timeframe.  I believe all of the industries that I identified above are in play or at least within a few years prior.   I have considered including Altus, since it also would tie in with the WT&J from Wichita Falls.  But that would definitely be at best a "Phase II" or more likely III or IV.

I picture Quanah being very similar to Emigrant on your layout, with the Burns Branch being the Altus Branch, and much shorter and more sparse trees.   :)    Layout/LDW-wise, I've just had a dickens of a time trying to figure out how to capture the essence of Quanah without it taking up so much real estate.   I go back and forth to a "no wye's and wrap the yard around to (roughly) parallel the main to the left" (which allows the Cotton Seed complex to be mostly a backdrop structure) to having the entire yard on a center peninsula and some sort of turnback to staging.   My best "middle ground" effort so far has been the aforementioned dogbone style plan, which I'll try to post when I get a chance.   It is a bit on the "suspended reality" side of the fence, but it lets me at least run some trains and start working on structures and eventually the helix and staging.
Doug