« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose  (Read 1316 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kisatchie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +63
Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« on: September 21, 2012, 02:36:06 PM »
0
Way back when these cabooses first came out, I read somewhere (Atlas forum?) that the dimensions were off. Specifically, I read that the caboose body was too tall. Is that correct, or is it a vicious rumor? I'd like to get a couple if the dimensions are accurate.


Hmm... bananas are never
too tall for me...

Logged
Two scientists create a teleportation ray, and they try it out on a cricket. They put the cricket on one of the two teleportation pads in the room, and they turn the ray on.
The cricket jumps across the room onto the other pad.
"It works! It works!"

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8859
  • Respect: +1248
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2012, 02:46:14 PM »
0
You could look through this thread.

https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=18387.0


Jason
Logged

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5008
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1551
    • Modutrak
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2012, 02:54:19 PM »
0
This should help you draw your own conclusion:

Logged

Kisatchie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +63
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2012, 03:27:54 PM »
0
That railwire link was some interesting reading.


Hmm... I had to get out
the "Hooked on Phonics"
book so Kiz could
understand it...

Logged
Two scientists create a teleportation ray, and they try it out on a cricket. They put the cricket on one of the two teleportation pads in the room, and they turn the ray on.
The cricket jumps across the room onto the other pad.
"It works! It works!"

Catt

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1721
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +28
    • Boylerwerx
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2012, 06:18:41 PM »
0
Quote
That railwire link was some interesting reading.

Yup, just like being on the ATLAS forums. :D
Logged
Johnathan (Catt) Edwards
Sole owner of the
Grande Valley Railway
100% Michigan made

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33272
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5515
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2012, 06:57:44 PM »
0
Speaking of the Atlas forum, there were some interesting posts there too.
This one has info from our top-  :ashat: himself.
http://forum.atlasrr.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=54157

And this is a long one (look at the last page for photos).  BTW, you  and Ms. Dee participated in this thread. Memory isn't what it used to be?  :trollface:
http://forum.atlasrr.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=53930
Logged
. . . 42 . . .

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5008
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1551
    • Modutrak
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2012, 08:55:34 PM »
0
Quote from: peteski on September 21, 2012, 06:57:44 PM
Speaking of the Atlas forum, there were some interesting posts there too.
This one has info from our top-  :ashat: himself.
http://forum.atlasrr.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=54157

I never did understand how :tommann: thought the caboose compared favorably to the prototype.  That's why I clipped out the comparative car sides to compare, and you can see how much taller and poorly proportioned the MTL car is.
Logged

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3279
  • Respect: +511
Re: Question About Micro-Trains Bay Window Caboose
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2012, 10:42:05 PM »
0
To be blunt...

If you can get the Athearn version, go for it and forget the MT model.  The Athearn is all-around better.  Only drawback to the Athearn might be (depending on your opinion) the McHenry couplers.  But they have not been a problem for me, and could certainly be somehow replaced if you had to do that.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »