0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have not. Does it matter that I'm running a "transition" era layout? Cabooses and such?
Following!@Ed Kapuscinski have been discussing if this type of operations is a good fit for my RGS First District. Pretty much any train that wasn't a stock extra (or a Galloping Goose) operated like a local.I'd love to see how you flesh this out.
I appreciate the detailed responses thus far. Good food for thought. I had never even considered the idea of a double run around!However, we may have ventured a little into the weeds. I suppose my question was pretty vague, but I was doing my wondering at a pretty macro level for a switching scenario.Given a sequence of trailing point switches, no other “gotchas”, would it be usual to work the set outs from the head end or the tail end of the train? In the yard do I try to block the setouts Power-A-B-C-Caboose or Power-C-B-A-Caboose? Either technically works but what would a real railroader do?When I pick up empties, can they go anywhere in a short local or would real railroaders always keep them in the back? I’m aware of string lining, but didn’t know if that comes into play with a dozen cars on a local. My references and period materials provide only photos and glimpses of what’s going on without understanding the bigger picture. Thanks again.
...but what would a real railroader do?
Individual block placement may be more of a concern on a road freight to make setting out blocks a little easier, but on a local you may be overthinking this.
I may certainly be guilty of overthinking. But if you’re willing to keep playing ball, how would it matter more, or what might I do better in this scenario for a road freight? Using same example, swap Industry A, B, C for a series of yards, interchanges or what have you along a route with set offs and pickups. Would it matter more now to work from the head end or tail end? All empties in the back?