0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Model manufacturers are really bad at gear design, basically everyone gets it wrong. The worm wheel should be skew cut, because the worm is and they need to mesh. If further reduction is needed, straight cut gears can be used, but they can't mesh with the worm wheel. There should be a second gear on the same shaft as the worm wheel. This can be straight cut and meshed with other gears.Lee, Ideally you would want to replace both the destroyed worm wheel and the driver gear with skew cut gears if they're going to mesh with each other.
I counted 22 well-worn teeth. Which is the same number of teeth in the gearbox in my photo. Might be a same gear. Unfortunately since I was working on that model for someone else, I do not have it anymore.Didn't someone here ( @u18b maybe) know a source for spare vintage brass model parts? What condition is the worm? Also worn down?If it was me, I wouldn't want to put that beautiful shell on some commercially made plastic model frame. The brass models have very finely made running gear. Delicate see-through spoked drivers, and very fine etched valve gear. Most non-brass loco's running gear looks very clunky in comparison.
It is a Samhongsa drive, so my guess is the part should be fairly common. It looks like Peteski was working on a PRR Consolidation, so it's possible that the design is used across several platforms.Lee
That would be a module 2.5 gear.