Author Topic: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets  (Read 1014 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chuck geiger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3256
  • Gender: Male
  • Las Piedras Railroad - Destination Desert
  • Respect: +2825
Will the Intermountain 33" sets work with all of these? They are brass (which is metal)? My couplers are all over the road, Would it better
to replace the trucks/couplers with truck-mounted couplers and then add the IM wheels?



« Last Edit: March 14, 2024, 06:32:57 PM by chuck geiger »
Chuck Geiger
provencountrypd@gmail.com



John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13389
  • Respect: +3250
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2024, 06:38:19 PM »
0
MTL are.540

jagged ben

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3249
  • Respect: +500
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2024, 06:46:39 PM »
+1
Just my experience and opinion, but IM's metal wheels suck.  Get the Fox Valley ones from Scale Trains instead.

Truck mounted couplers may be easier to get at the right height but are inferior to body mounting in pretty much all other respects.  There's no substitute for carefully installing body mounted couplers.  Metal wheels will not fix that.

The difference between .540" and .537" is not meaningful.

chuck geiger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3256
  • Gender: Male
  • Las Piedras Railroad - Destination Desert
  • Respect: +2825
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2024, 06:54:53 PM »
0
See hats of a$$ rock! thanks
Chuck Geiger
provencountrypd@gmail.com



chuck geiger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3256
  • Gender: Male
  • Las Piedras Railroad - Destination Desert
  • Respect: +2825
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2024, 06:57:39 PM »
0
Just my experience and opinion, but IM's metal wheels suck.  Get the Fox Valley ones from Scale Trains instead.

Truck mounted couplers may be easier to get at the right height but are inferior to body mounting in pretty much all other respects.  There's no substitute for carefully installing body mounted couplers.  Metal wheels will not fix that.

The difference between .540" and .537" is not meaningful.

Yes they rock, love the fact they show size and mfg. that they work on.
Chuck Geiger
provencountrypd@gmail.com



GM50 4164

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 231
  • Respect: +100
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2024, 08:43:32 PM »
0
Chuck, I use a little bit of everything. I have some from FV (ST), ExactRail, Tangent and ESM. I use them differently though. I like the wider treads on the ER as it gives just a little bit more weight to a otherwise light car. Tangents I'm using for all of my coal cars with MT trucks. The FV goes into pretty much everything else needed. I'm now using the ESM wheels for the same reason as the ones from ER.



Benjamin H

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9895
  • Respect: +1446
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2024, 01:56:16 AM »
0
I used FV and IM, and they worked, but most of my cars ended up with ESM for one simple reason - When I wanted to order some, they were usually the only brand available!

At least from my dealer, they're almost always available, and if not, are soon back in stock.  I have some IM wheels that have been on backorder since October of 2021.
N Kalanaga
Be well

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13389
  • Respect: +3250

chuck geiger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3256
  • Gender: Male
  • Las Piedras Railroad - Destination Desert
  • Respect: +2825
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2024, 09:41:02 AM »
0
Ha Ha See I don't have any issues with plastic wheels.
Chuck Geiger
provencountrypd@gmail.com



DeltaBravo

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 640
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +208
    • N-Scale and other interest
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2024, 12:02:44 PM »
0
I have used FV, IM, and ESM. All mostly work fine, but I have had more issues with my FV than the others. Mostly the wheels not being properly seated on the axle. Additionally the scale tread wheels tend to derail if there is any variance in gauge. I have ended up using mostly the IM wheels. I find they track well, weight a hair more and have yet to have the wheels come off. Of course your mileage may vary.
David B.
 
Member WMRHS

https://undara.wordpress.com/


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2024, 06:32:59 PM »
0
I have some FV and like David have more issues with them having to reseat the wheel on the axle.  I have a lot of IM wheels as that's what's been available at shop and don't have any issues.  Recent runs have been incorrectly sized axle lengths (discussed here in other threads) but have found uses for all of them.

MetroRedLine

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 580
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +170
    • Union Pacific Vallealmar Subdivision (Facebook Page)
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #11 on: March 15, 2024, 06:47:27 PM »
0
Just my experience and opinion, but IM's metal wheels suck.  Get the Fox Valley ones from Scale Trains instead.

Truck mounted couplers may be easier to get at the right height but are inferior to body mounting in pretty much all other respects.  There's no substitute for carefully installing body mounted couplers.  Metal wheels will not fix that.

The difference between .540" and .537" is not meaningful.

Very true. .540" and .537" are essentially the same; a .347" axle width means the wheels will be more free-rolling in a standard MTL-compatible .540" truck, which is actually better.

Intermountain metal wheels are what I started out on when it came to metal wheels. They're not bad, but they're also not very prototypical-looking. If that matters, then I recommend to only get the following wheelsets:

Fox Valley Models (by ScaleTrains)
Eastern Seaboard Models
BLMA (by Atlas)
Under the streets of Los Angeles

BruceStikkers

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 85
  • Respect: +12
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #12 on: March 15, 2024, 06:53:09 PM »
0
I have fiddled around with many types as they came out over the years and have settled on ESM as the best rolling and looking.

Bruce Stikkers
St. Joseph, IL

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #13 on: March 15, 2024, 07:01:19 PM »
+1
Newer IM wheels are much improved in appearance over the old ones

Mike Madonna

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • Respect: +125
Re: Coverting MTL, Atlas, Roundhouse and Atheran Rolling Stock Wheel Sets
« Reply #14 on: March 15, 2024, 09:16:56 PM »
0
I've used Fox Valley, both "semi-scale" (read narrow profile) and "standard" (wider tread) wheel sets. I have also recently started to use the ESM wheels. The FVM wheels have a little better looking wheel "face". However, when it comes to "free rolling", the ESM wheels are a bit better, IMHO. When one looks at the needle point end of the axle, the ESM has a slightly less "angle" on the point that fits in the truck side frame. I believe this allows for a little less friction in that area. A 40' standard MTL SD Boxcar with ESM wheels will roll at least another 4-5 car lengths than a similarly equipped car with FVM wheels (narrow or wide tread) on a test "incline" I set up. I'll give up a little "prototype fidelity" for a freer rolling car....
Mike
SOUTHERN PACIFIC Coast Division 1953
Santa Margarita Sub