0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
And I may add how hijacked this thread has become........
You must be new! I think there's something in the terms of service when you sign up. All threads must become hijacked within a certain number of posts...
The GN SDP40 would be nice, but it fits better on an SD45 chassis.
This thread reminds me of the reasons I incorrectly got so mad at my IM SD40-2s. They LOOKED like they rode too high, but most of that impression was because the Kato units that I THOUGHT were correct rode too low.
Kato hoods are more like 8 feet wide. It may not seem like much, but your eye can spot the proportional discrepancy. If I'm going to go to the trouble of custom building a few models, the shell needs to fit the upcoming Atlas SD45, which will have correct proportions. As an added bonus, it will already have sound (so no grinding a Kato mechanism) and the walkway will already be 90% correct, if there are those who don't want to bother soldering custom handrails.
Would correcting the walkway height cause compatibility or visual issues with Kato frames and mechanisms?If I may be so bold, have you considered the Great Northern's small run of SDP40 locomotives? If I understand the drawings, it should be a drop-on to the Kato SD40 chassis. Given the recent activity of the MN Transportation Museum's model, there are lots of photos out there. You'd have to do different rear steps, as seen here: https://www.railpictures.net/photo/828455/ with a good side shot here: https://www.railpictures.net/photo/814942/. This site has a link to a decent diagram of one, although it notes there are a few differences between the diagram and the proto. It's a better diagram than the one I have in PDF form (the EMD brochure, basically - this site has taken the time to properly align everything). http://erixrailcar.com/mtm/gn325.htm