0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
And, I agree about the smoke possibly adding to the ambiance in a photo or close-in video.
IMO, Photoshoping smoke after taking the photo of a smoke-free model would look more realistic than the "real" N scale smoke.
I'm still trying to figure out why my tender keeps derailing and I'm starting to think it has something to do with this rather byzantine drawbar situation -What I'm seeing is that the cab will swing way out when the loco enters a curve (and note that my tightest curve is 19" radius). Then, when it re-enters a straight and the cab swings back over the rails, there is an audible click accompanied by a noticeable jump in the tender. At this point the tender will more often than not run crooked with one of its wheels derailed until it hits my double x-over and then rerails itself. So, it seems like that drawbar is getting a bit hung up in the curve-to-straight transition, building up pressure, and then breaking loose with excessive force.Anybody else seeing this? Anybody else actually running one of these things?Thanks,-Mark
FYI, if anyone is interested, MBK has 10% off locomotives right now and these apply:https://www.modeltrainstuff.com/trains/locomotives/#/filter:custom_scale:N
I think the sale ended yesterday, 1/29.But I think the 10% off Train World sale is ending today. But 10% does not apply to new release or pre-order.
The first thing that jumps out at me is that circular mold mark right at the center "V". It looks like it is raised above the surrounding surfaces.And the surfaces themselves look slightly rough, almost like a 3D print surface. That drawbar/slot system has to be smooth like a mirror - smooth like the glossy surfaces on a Microtrains truck bolster - for it to work. And I wouldn't bother with any kind of lube, graphite or otherwise. This problem has to be solved mechanically. The surfaces have to be so smooth that the pin cannot possibly hang up in there no matter what angle, no matter what forces are on it.Perhaps somebody with a BLI engine that is NOT exhibiting this problem would post a super-close-up of that same drawbar area, so we can compare them? This might be a manufacturing tolerance or QA problem. Maybe that raised circular area isn't that pronounced on all of them.
The "circular mold mark" on mine is actually slightly indented. I don't have any problems on my test trackage which consists of two 6' Code55 tracks, a programming track, a hand-laid #6 dead-frog turnout made to "tight" NMRA standards, and an old ME #6 that's also a dead frog. Both my customer's 4014 and my own 4012 roll through this crossover smooth as silk.By the way, I checked the gauge on every wheelset on both BLI Big Boys, and every wheelset was spot-on...the second N-scale engine I've ever had that was correctly gauged straight out of the box like all of my Kato FEF-3's.Photo (1) - BLI #4014's trailing truck & drawbar configuration:Cheerio!Bob Gilmore
... I just saw Spookshow's scathing review (ouch!!! ) ...
That looks like a typical "Kinematic" design for drawbars or coupler mounts.
What's 'typical' about it. I only know of the Kato ones, and this isn't designed like that.Jason