0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Didn't Ford have a "Maverick" sedan model in the late 60's?
Didn't Ford have a "Maverick" sedan model in the late 60's? I recall the marketing gimmick with it was a screw driver was all that you needed to perform many adjustments.
The new Ranger is too big. May as well spring for an F150. Can't figure out why they ceded the compact pickup market in the first place.
Sounds like you took adding stay-alive caps too far there Ed.
Management by spreadsheet.Honestly, I get it: they couldn't lose business to a competitor that doesn't exist and the cost of improving the existing Ranger (to keep it sellable) was likely higher than the sales they'd lose with people who move out of the market.
Ed, the problem with that statement is they NEVER stopped making/selling the Ranger. Ford just stopped selling/marketing it to the US/CAN markets.
This is sooo wrong, but I love it.
garethashenden: Turnouts on bridges weren't common, but they weren't all that rare, either, especially in areas with a lot of small streams. Model railroaders are probably less likely to use them than the prototype, because it's harder to hide our turnout linkages.I would suggest adding walkways to both sides of the bridge. Your brakemen needs somewhere to walk! As an alternative, if there's no reason to walk alongside a train there, plank between the rails, so the brakeman can at least get from the cab to the switchstand, on a trailing-point move.
My brother had an original Maverick purchased new in Army OD green. Ugly! By the time he traded it in you could watch the pavement go by through the rust holes in the floor.
I also was never a fan of original Mavericks. Found hem unattractive.
Enough already of the crappy Found On Road Dead.Here's what real men drive