0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
It would be more "flexible" in the sense of where and how it could be used if it did not require a special transition section between each piece of flex track and sectional track to join them.I don't have any Kato flex track to play with, but I am thinking that the transition piece is not really necessary. Why not just pull the Kato sectional joiner off the one side and use the flex track joiners to connect the flex track directly to any piece of sectional track?
So then it could be done with any flex track. The Kato flex stuff probably best matches the "look" of Kato sectional track and switches. And maybe it has that magic alloy rail that doesn't oxidize as fast?
I would not jump to any conclusions about Kato flex track. Until it can be compared with Atlas and Peco Code 80 we don’t know what it matches.Kato has sold flex track in Japan since very early on, likely repackaged from other brands. If it was on roadbed matching the look of Unitrack it would be worth noting. As far as I know there was no demand for another Code 80 flex track with 1965 tie size and spacing even if it is an approximation of Japanese meter gauge track...Charlie Vlk